<!doctype tei2 public "-//Library of Congress - Historical Collections (American Memory)//DTD ammem.dtd//EN" 
[
<!entity % images system "19129.ent"> %images;
]>
<tei2>
<teiheader type="text" date.created="1996/02/16" date.updated="1998/07/30" status="updated" creator="National Digital Library Program, Library of Congress">
<filedesc>
<titlestmt>
<amid type="aggitemid">lhbum-19129</amid>
<title>Progressive men of Minnesota.  Biographical sketches and portraits of the leaders in business, politics and the professions; together with an historical and descriptive sketch of the state:  a machine-readable transcription.</title>
<amcol><amcolname> Pioneering the Upper Midwest: Books from Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin, ca. 1820-1910, Library of Congress.</amcolname>
<amcolid type="aggid"></amcolid>
</amcol>
<respstmt>
<resp>Selected and converted.</resp>
<name>Library of Congress.</name>
</respstmt></titlestmt>
<publicationstmt>
<p>Washington, DC, 1995.</p>
<p>Preceding element provides place and date of transcription only.</p>
<p>For more information about this text and this Library of Congress Historical Collection, refer to accompanying matter.</p>
</publicationstmt>
<sourcedesc>
<lccn>03-19129</lccn>
<sourcecol>General Collection, Library of Congress.</sourcecol>
<copyright>Copyright status not determined; refer to accompanying matter.</copyright></sourcedesc>
</filedesc>
<encodingdesc>
<projectdesc><p>The National Digital Library Program at the Library of Congress makes digitized historical materials available for education and scholarship.</p></projectdesc>
<editorialdecl><p>This transcription is intended to have an accuracy of 99.95 percent or greater and is not intended to reproduce the appearance of the original work.  The accompanying images provide a facsimile of this work and represent the appearance of the original.</p></editorialdecl>
<encodingdate>1996/02/16</encodingdate>
<revdate>1998/07/30</revdate>
</encodingdesc>
</teiheader>
<text type="publication">
<front>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129001">001</controlpgno>
<printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div type="idinfo">
<p>
<handwritten>
<omit reason="illegible">
<lb>
871 - E
<lb>
77</handwritten></p>
<p>
<hi rend="smallcaps">Progressive Men of Minnesota.</hi></p>
<p>BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES AND PORTRAITS
<lb>
OF THE
<lb>
LEADERS IN BUSINESS, POLITICS AND THE PROFESSIONS;
<lb>
TOGETHER WITH AN
<lb>
HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE SKETCH OF THE STATE.</p>
<p>Edited by MARION D. SHUTTER, D. D., and J. S. McLAIN, M. A.</p>
<p>MINNEAPOLIS:
<lb>

<hi rend="smallcaps">THE MINNESOTA JOURNAL,</hi>
<lb>
1897.</p>
<p>
<stamped>
<omit reason="illegible">
<lb>
AUG 16 1897
<lb>

<omit reason="illegible"></stamped></p>
<p>
<handwritten>35777-Cz-1</handwritten></p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129002">002</controlpgno>
<printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<p>
<handwritten>F605
<lb>
.S56</handwritten></p>
<p>Copyrighted by 

<hi rend="smallcaps">The Minneapolis Journal.</hi>
<lb>
1897</p>
<p>
<handwritten>F605
<lb>
.S56</handwritten></p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129003">003</controlpgno>
<printpgno></printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>PREFACE.</head>
<p>It is a generally accepted proposition that the growth and development of any community along right lines depend more upon the character of its population that upon any other causes; and to a correct understanding of the forces which have contributed to the upbuilding of this commonwealth some knowledge of the men who have been instrumental in making Minnesota what it is, is necessary.  The population of the state is increasing at a rapid rate and many thousands from other states and countries become residents every year, who are unfamiliar with its history and unacquainted with the men who have made that history.  The purpose of this volume is to furnish a convenient and trustworthy source from which accurate knowledge of the history of the state may be obtained.  Special efforts have been made to collect information with regard to the men active and foremost in business, professional and official life to-day, and also with regard to those who have in the past played leading parts in the making of a great state.  In addition to the biographical sketches, the reader will find here a carefully prepared description of Minnesota, viewed from the standpoint of its natural resources and from that of its public history.</p></div></front>
<body>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129004">004</controlpgno>
<printpgno>9</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>MINNESOTA;
<lb>
Its History and Resources.
<lb>
MARION D. SHUTTER.</head>
<p>
<hi rend="blockindent">&ldquo;Should you ask me, Whence these stories,
<lb>
Whence these legends and traditions?</hi></p>
<p>
<hi rend="blockindent">I should answer, I should tell you,
<lb>
From the forests and the prairies,
<lb>
From the great lakes of the Northland,
<lb>
From the land of the Ojibways,
<lb>
From the Land of the Dakotas.&rdquo;</hi></p>
<p>&mdash;Longfellow.</p>
<p>The writer has undertaken to present, in the following pages, a brief historical sketch of the state of Minnesota and some account of its present resources.</p>
<p>Just thirty-eight have elapsed since the star representing the &ldquo;land of the sky-tinted water&rdquo; was placed upon the national banner.  There are those living to-day whose memories go back beyond the formation of the state, and even back to the times that antedated the organization of the territory.  The first governor elected after the state had been admitted to the union is still with us in a hale and vigorous old age.  He has just presided at the annual meeting of the State Historical Society.  Many of those survive who helped to shape the early affairs of the state and to lay the foundations of its after greatness.  Some of these are mentioned in this sketch, and also in the body of the present work.  It is, however, more the object of this volume to set forth what is being done by those who are making history
<lb>
to-day, who are now directing the course of events.  The lives and deeds of the Fathers are elsewhere recorded.  They have labored, and the present generation has entered into their labors.  They have laid the corner-stone, and it is for those who are taking their places to build a structure that shall be worthy of their toils and sacrifices.  Let us face the future in the same hope and courage with which our fathers conquered the past.</p>
<p>That future is bright with promise.  The geographical position and natural resources of this state are prophetic of destiny.  Some such intimation seems to have danced through the brain of the Aborigine:  for the Dakotahs used to claim superiority over their other savage brethren, because their &ldquo;sacred men asserted that the mouth of the Minnesota river was immediately over the center of the earth and immediately under the center of the heavens.&rdquo;  Dismissing this tribal fancy, it is worthy of note that Baron D&apos;Avagour, while 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129005">005</controlpgno>
<printpgno>10</printpgno></pageinfo>governor of Canada, sent to the French government (August 14, 1663) a message in which, after referring to Lake Huron, he wrote:  &ldquo;Beyond is met another called Lake Superior, the waters of which, it is believed, flow into New Spain, and this, according to the general opinion, ought to be the center of the country.&rdquo;  To come to more modern times, the words of William H. Seward, at St. Paul in 1860, though often quoted, may be referred to once more.  &ldquo;I now believe,&rdquo; he said, after a survey of the country, its place, and its resources, &ldquo;that the ultimate seat of government on this great continent will be found somewhere within a radius of not very far from the spot on which I now stand, at the head of navigation on the Mississippi river.&rdquo;  These are some of the predictions of Minnesota&apos;s destiny, from the wild dreams of the original savage to the sober words of the recent distinguished statesman.</p>
<p>But for the present, we must turn from speculations concerning the future, to review the history of the past.</p>
<div>
<head>I.
<lb>
THE ABORIGINES.</head>
<p>On the 13th of January, 1851, when Alexander Ramsey was taking the chair as president of the Historical Society, he said:  &ldquo;Minnesota has a history and that not altogether an unwritten one, which can unravel many a page of deep, engrossing interest, which is rich in tales of daring enterprise, of faithful endurances, of high hopes; which is marked by the early traveler&apos;s foot-prints, and by the ancient explorer&apos;s pencil; which is glowing with the myths and traditions of our aboriginal races, sprinkled over with their battle-fields, with the sites of their ancient villages, and with the wah-kaun stones of their teeming mythology.  With these &ldquo;original races&rdquo; our sketch must begin.</p>
<p>Even earlier than the year 1634, the Indians around the great lakes had learned to carry their furs to Quebec, where they received in exchange such articles of European manufacture as suited their needs or pleased their fancy; but in this year (1634), two priests named Breboeuf and Daniel, fired with zeal for the Church, accompanied a party of Hurons from Quebec back to their distant home.  Neil tells us that they were
<lb>
the first European who erected a house in the neighborhood of Lake Huron; and that &ldquo;seven years later, a bark canoe containing priests of the same order, passed through the river Ottawa and coasted along the shores of Lake Huron to visit, by invitation, the Ojibways, at the outlet of Lake Superior.&rdquo;  It required seventeen days from the time of starting for that bark canoe to reach the Falls of St. Mary; and here the priests found two thousand of the tribe assembled, waiting to receive them and listen to their message.</p>
<p>It was upon this missionary journey that the white men heard, for the first time, of the tribe of the Dakotahs, on the site of whose lodges and wigwams the cities and towns of Minnesota have arisen.</p>
<p>The Ojibways informed the priests that the Dakotahs lived eighteen days&apos; journey farther towards the west.  This was in 1634.  It was twenty years later before the white man penetrated the Dakotah territory.  In this year two young men, &ldquo;connected with the fur trade, followed a party of Indians in their hunting excursions,&rdquo; and were finally thus conducted to the borders of the Dakotahs.  This was in 1654.  When they returned to Quebec, they gave such glowing accounts of the lands, lakes, rivers, people, resources, that both trader and priest became enthusiastic for its conquest.  The trader at first fared better than the priest; for good Father Mesnard was lost in attempting to reach the newly discovered savages; and tradition asserts that only his cassock and prayer-book completed, in some mysterious way, the journey, and were kept for many years by the Dakotahs as amulets.</p>
<p>The word Dakotah, by which the original occupants of the soil of Minnesota designated themselves, signifies allied, or joined together, or federated.  Nearly two centuries ago, it was written of them.  &ldquo;For sixty leagues from the extremity of the upper lake towards sunset, and as it were, in the center of the western nations, they have all united their force by a general league.&rdquo;  The name Sioux which is most familiar to us, originated with the early French discoverers.  The Ojibways of Lake Superior had, from time immemorial, waged war against the Dakotahs, and naturally always referred to them as enemies.  The term they used was Nadowaysioux.  The French, according to Charlevoix, abbreviated this term by 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129006">006</controlpgno>
<printpgno>11</printpgno></pageinfo>using only the latter part of it.  He says:  &ldquo;The name of Sioux that we give to these Indians is entirely of our own making; or, rather, it is the last two syllables of the name of Nadouessioux, as many nations call them.&rdquo;</p>
<p>There have been three great divisions of the Dakotahs, or Sioux; and these have been still farther subdivided.  These subdivisions are too numerous to mention in such a sketch as the present one.  The first of the three principal divisions was called the Isanyati, whose chief band was the M&apos;dewakantonwan, and their territory was around the shores of Mille Lacs and along the borders of Rum River.  The second of these divisions was the Ihanktonwan, most commonly called Yankton; and they are said to have occupied the region west of Mille Lacs and north of the Minnesota river.  The third division is the Titonwan, who dwelt at Lac qui Parle and Big Stone lake.</p>
<p>The language of the Dakotahs was different from that of other Indian tribes, and was no more understood by those tribes than by the white men.  The first mention of a Dakotah word in a European book is found in Father Hennepin&apos;s account.  When the savages saw him reading his breviary they exclaimed, &ldquo;Wakan-de!&rdquo;  His companions interpreted it as an expression of displeasure and begged Father Hennepin to be less public in his devotions, fearing that the Indians would murder them all.  The father complied, although they afterwards discovered that the word was simply an expression of surprise and wonder.  A grammar and dictionary of the Dakotah language, compiled by Rev. S. R. Riggs, of Lac qui Parle, has been published by the Smithsonian Institute, under the auspices of the Minnesota Historical Society.  The language, as embodied in these works, reflects the surroundings, the mental habits, and the state of progress of these savages.  Their vocabulary of trees and shrubs &ldquo;covers probably all, or nearly all, the varieties which grow in their country, .. but they have very few specific names for flowers.&rdquo;  The sense of beauty is almost entirely lacking.  One can not make bows and arrows and tent-poles out of flowers.  Fish and birds all have names, and there are words which show an intimate acquaintance with their habits.  Engaged in constantly dissecting wild animals, &ldquo;their vocabulary
<lb>
of terms denoting the different parts of the body is extensive and definite.&rdquo;  But &ldquo;in terms to denote abstract ideas, the Dakotah language is undoubtedly defective.&rdquo;  The ideas themselves were absent.  In this connection, Mr. Riggs says:  &ldquo;It is only just to remark that the language under consideration is possessed of great flexibility; almost all words expressing quality may be so changed as to the stand for those qualities in the abstract.&rdquo;  The Dakotah noun is not properly declinable.  Variation are denoted by affixing and suffixing pronouns.  These are of great number and power of expression.  &ldquo;Nothing can be found anywhere more full and flexible than the Dakotah verb.  The affixes and reduplications and pronouns and prepositions all come in to make it of such a stately pile of thoughts as is to be found nowhere else.  A single paradigm presents more than a thousand variations.&rdquo;  In the arrangement of predicate and substantive in a sentence, &ldquo;the Dakotah language is eminently simple and natural.  The sentence &lsquo;Give me bread,&rsquo; a Dakotah transposes to &lsquo;Bread me give.&rsquo;  Such is the genius of the language that in translating a sentence or verse from the Bible, one expects to begin not at the beginning, but at the end.  And, such, too, is the common practice of their best interpreters; where the person who is speaking leaves off, there they usually commence and proceed backward to the beginning.  In this way, the connection of a sentence is more easily retained in the mind and more naturally evolved.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Passing on to the religion of the Dakotahs, without entering into the details of their belief and worship, we may use the comprehensive statement of General Sibley:  &ldquo;The religion of the Dakotahs is a mere myth.  It has been asserted that the Indian race are monotheists, and therefore far in advance of other pagans who believe in a multiplicity of deities; that they look forward to a future state and to its retributions.  I regret to be obliged to express an opinion on this subject which must conflict with such favorable impressions.  The belief attributed to the eastern tribes of a happy hunting-ground for the good and wastes devoid of game for the bad, in another sphere of existence finds no response in the breast of a Dakotah.  He seeks to propitiate what he calls the Great Spirit and a multitude of minor spirits, especially those embodied in oval-shaped 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129007">007</controlpgno>
<printpgno>12</printpgno></pageinfo>stones, by sacrifices of tobacco and other trifling articles, not because he hopes or cares for reward in a higher state of being, but because he deprecates the visitations of their anger upon the earth in the form of disease, accident, or death, to himself or his family.  I have no reason to believe that any Dakotah, among the very many with whom I have conversed on the subject, was ever deterred from the commission of a crime by a fear of punishment in another world, nor have I been able to satisfy myself that their impressions of a future state are anything but shadowy, uncertain and unsatisfactory.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The manners and customs of the Dakotah tribes present an interesting field of research; but our present sketch must be confined to a hurried survey.  The Dakotahs were fond of war, and so relentless in battle that other tribes feared them.  Their children were cradled to the sound of battle-music; and the first playthings were miniature bows and arrows.  War and the chase were the Dakotah&apos;s chief employments; and in the intervals he observed the feasts and dances of religion.  The domestic life was that of all savages.  The wife or wives&mdash;for they were polygamous&mdash;was obtained by purchase and devoted to the service of a slave or drudge.  In moving from place to place, the Dakotah woman carried the lodge, camp-kettles, axe, babies and small dogs upon her back.  She erected the teepee, cut the wood, built the fires, and cooked the meals.  She was subject to all the whims of here husband, and was usually treated with harshness and cruelty.  As a result, suicides were frequent among Dakotah women.  The food of these Indians was principally fish, venison, buffalo and dog-meat.  One of the old chiefs once declared to a party of explorers:  &ldquo;The savage loves dog-meat as well as the white man loves pork.&rdquo;  They did not cultivate the soil.  Sometimes they used a species of wild rice that grew in the swamps.  Dependent upon the steam and the chase, they were constantly oscillating between starvation and gluttony.  Without regular hours for eating, they were also without regular hours for sleep.  In person they were filthy and full of vermin.  Their bodies were more familiar with paint than with water.  Adulterous and thievish, they were at last compelled to enter into certain compacts for self-preservation&mdash;upon Sir John Falstaff&apos;s principle that &ldquo;thieves must
<lb>
be true to each other.&rdquo;  &ldquo;The Sioux nation,&rdquo; says Culbertson, &ldquo;has no general council, but each tribe and band determines its own affairs.  These bands have some ties of interest analogous to our secret societies.  The &lsquo;Crow-feather-in-cap&rsquo; band are pledged to protect each other&apos;s wives and to refrain from violating them.  If the wife of one of their number is stolen from another of their number, she is returned, the band either paying the thief to restore the stolen property or forcing him to do it.  The &lsquo;Strong-Heart&rsquo; band is pledged to protect each other in their horses.&rdquo;  And so on.  The Dakotah had his hours of recreation, as well as his battles and chase and religious dances.  His favorite pastime was a game of ball corresponding with what school-boys used to call &ldquo;shinney.&rdquo;  Betting ran high, hundreds of dollars&apos; worth of property was often lost and won on a single game.  Guns, horses, blankets, belts and ornaments used to change hands with marvelous rapidity.  The game usually broke up, as games in more modern times occasionally do, in clamorous disputes and altercations.  When, after his precarious existence, enlivened by war and chase and dance and play, the Dakotah died, his nearest friend was always anxious to go out and kill somebody, especially an enemy.  Neil relates that &ldquo;a father lost his child while the treaty of 1851 was pending at Mendota, and he longed to go and kill an Ojibway.&rdquo;  The corpse was always wrapped in its best clothes, and some one acquainted with the deceased would harangue the unseen powers as well as the friends of the departed, upon his virtues.  The friends would sit with black pigment, the sign of mourning, on their faces.  Loud lamentations rent the air, and the mourners cut their thighs and legs with their finger-nails, or pieces of stone.  &ldquo;The corpse is not buried, but placed in a box upon a scaffold some eight or ten feet from the ground.  Hung around the scaffold are such things as would please the spirit, if it were still in the flesh, such as the scalp of an enemy or pots of food.  After the corpse has been exposed for some months, and the bones only remain, they are buried in a heap, and protected from the wolves by stakes.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Such were the tribes who dwelt upon the soil of Minnesota before the axe of the white man rang through its forests or his plough-share had turned the soil of its prairies.  So lived the Dakotah, 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129008">008</controlpgno>
<printpgno>13</printpgno></pageinfo>and so he died.  Some of the legends of this primitive people still linger in our literature, and names of Dakotah origin are still borne by our towns and lakes and rivers.  These are pleasant memorials of a time that is gone and a race that is almost extinct.  But, on the other hand, as we shall see later, the savagery of the Dakotah has written the record of his conflict with civilization in letters of blood.  Among the historic places of our state are battle-fields where the heroic settler bravely met the insane fury of the Dakotah&apos;s merciless attacks.  There are men and women living to-day who remember scenes of massacre in which their own friends and relatives went down under the tomahawk and scalping-knife!</p></div>
<div>
<head>II.
<lb>
VOYAGE AND DISCOVERY.</head>
<p>We have already described how the white men originally heard of the land of the Dakotahs, and how they first made their way to its borders.  Let us now return and follow up the story of voyage and discovery.  Little by little the area of savagery is to be opened to civilization.  In this work the initiative is always taken by traveler and trader.  The emissaries of commerce prepare the way for the priest.  The trading-post is the center around which, later, churches and schools are built.  It will be interesting to trace the processes by which section after section of what is now the state of Minnesota was added to the map of the world.</p>
<p>In May 1671, the most notable gathering that, up to that time, had been held upon this continent, assembled at Sault Ste. Marie.  For months before, Nicholas Perrot, at the request of the Canadian authorities, had been visiting the various tribes of the Northwest, inviting them to this council.  For months before, DeLusson had been exploring the country around the great lakes to find out its resources&mdash;planting the cross of the church and the arms of France wherever he went.  The French and the Indians must now have an understanding in regard to trade.  At this great conference they meet to form a compact.  There were present, on this occasion, the most noted travelers and ecclesiastics of the day.  De Lusson, Perrot and Joliet were there; and there also were
<lb>
Fathers Allouez and Dablon.  Before them sat the representatives of the various tribes.  They were freshly decorated with paint and feathers, and wrapped in their best furs of beaver and buffalo.  Father allouez, the first priest who had seen the Dakotahs face to face, and who had founded the Ojibway mission at La Pointe, opened the proceedings.  He addressed the Indians, telling them of the Great King beyond the sea, describing the monarch&apos;s power and grandeur.  Two holes were then dug, in one of which was planted a cedar column, in the other a cedar cross.  Then the Europeans sang one of the Latin hymns of the Church, after which, to column and cross were fastened metal plates engraved with the arms of France.  De Lusson then addressed the Indians in French, and Perrot acted as interpreter.  The Indians listened with approval, a treaty of mutual good will and assistance was made, certain stipulations were agreed upon in regard to trade; and the ceremonies were followed by a grand discharge of musketry.  The Te Deum sung by the whole council terminated the proceedings.  Thus was the region around the great lakes formally introduced to French dominion, and the gates of exploration and traffic thrown open.</p>
<p>The great river of Minnesota is the Mississippi; and it was but natural that the first explorations should be made along this highway of waters.  Father Allouez first heard the name of this stream in the fall of 1665, while visiting the Minnesota shores of Lake Superior.  He wrote it as he thought the Chippeways pronounced it, &ldquo;Messipi.&rdquo; Father Marquette (whose statue has just been placed in the capitol at Washington), during his missionary tours in the neighborhood of Lake Superior, heard so much of this great river of the Sioux country, that he determined to go in search of it.  He and his companions left the mission at Green Bay on the 10th of July, 1673, and went up the Fox river on birch-bark canoes.  They made a portage to the Wisconsin; then placed their canoes upon its waters and floated down to the Mississippi, a seven days&apos; journey.  Entering the Mississippi, they went down to the Illinois and returned to Green Bay by way of the Illinois and Lake Michigan, arriving at the place whence they started, the last of September&mdash;a remarkable feat.</p>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129009">009</controlpgno>
<printpgno>14</printpgno></pageinfo>
<p>This voyage of Father Marquette was deeply interesting to a native of Rouen, name La Salle, who was living at his trading post, Fort Frontenac, Canada, on the site of the present city of Kingston.  La Salle believed that there was a short route to China and Japan from the headwaters of the Mississippi.  He sailed to France to obtain the patronage of Louis XIV., and in 1678 received permission &ldquo;to make discoveries in the western part of New France, to build forts wherever they were necessary, and to enjoy the exclusive right to the trade in buffalo skins which were just beginning to be known and valued in Europe.&rdquo;  One of the first things La Salle did, after his return from France, was to build a large vessel for navigating the lakes.  It made but one voyage.  On its return from Green Bay to the Niagara river, it was lost; for no tidings of it were ever received.  After sending out this ship that never returned, La Salle and his followers, among whom was Father Hennepin, coasted with their four birch-bark canoes along the eastern shore of Wisconsin, and at last descended the Illinois river to the present site of the Peoria, where they built a fort.  They also constructed here a vessel for navigating the Mississippi.  In this vessel La Salle sent Father Hennepin to discover the sources of the wonderful stream&mdash;confident that when he had found these sources, he would also find the new route to China and Japan.</p>
<p>On the 29th of February, 1680, with two companions, Richard du Gay and Michael Accault, Hennepin embarked.  He did not discover the sources of the great river or the new route to the Orient; but he did make discoveries that have identified his name forever with the history of Minnesota.  It is not easy to determine the order in which Hennepin made his discoveries; but it is probable that the first of these was Lake Pepin.  In the neighborhood of the mouth of the Wisconsin he and his companions were captured by a party of Indians.  With them he passed through the Lac des Pluers, which was shortly afterwards called Pepin.  He thus describes his experiences:  About thirty leagues above Black river, we found the Lake of Tears which we named so, because the savages who took us, as it will be hereafter related, consulted in this place, what they should do with their prisoners, and those who were for murdering cried all night upon us, to oblige by
<lb>
their tears, their companions to consent to our death.  The lake is formed by the &lsquo;Meschasipi,&rsquo; and may be seven leagues long and five broad.&rdquo;  Some miles below the site of St. Paul the Indians landed, at a point opposite Red Rock, and thence journeyed by trail to Mille Lacs.  Afterwards, with a hunting party, Hennepin descended the Rum river, and camped at its mouth.  Here they nearly perished of famine, and at last, yielding to his earnest entreaties, the Indians allowed him to go free.  After some day&apos;s traveling, he came to a cataract which he says &ldquo;indeed of itself is terrible and hath something very astonishing.&rdquo;  He reported this cataract to be sixty feet high.  &ldquo;Near the cataract,&rdquo; he says, &ldquo;was a bearskin upon a pole, a sort of oblation to the spirit in the waters.&rdquo;  After carving the cross and the arms of France upon a tree, he called the falls by the name of the patron saint of his expedition.  Saint Anthony of Padua.  The first white man who looked upon the mighty torrent, now harnessed to the machinery of a great city, was Louis Hennepin.  This was in the month of July, 1686.</p>
<p>To this same time belong the names and deeds of several other discoveries.  Leaving his post on Lake Superior in the mouth of June, 1686, Du Luth explored the country to the Lake of the Issati, Mille Lac, which he afterwards called Lake Buade, from the family name of Frontenac, governor of Canada.  He also ascended the St. Louis river, then called the &ldquo;Bois Brule,&rdquo; to its source, exploring the country drained by its waters.  His name is preserved in the name of the young and vigorous city that has sprung up in the field of his activities.  He was the first to plant the arms of France in the land of the Dakotahs.</p>
<p>In the spring of 1683, the first trading-post was established in Minnesota, on Lake Pepin, by Nicholas Perrot, and a fort was built which for a long time bore his name.  A few years later, the Indians, instigated by the English, began to make trouble for the French farther east, and Perrot and his followers, leaving a few half-breeds to protect their goods at the trading-post, joined Du Luth who was in command at Green Bay.  Returning with forty men to Lake Pepin, in 1688, the next year he formally claimed the country for France.  The document in which this claim is made is called the Proces-Verbal, and is the first official document in relation to Minnesota; for 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129010">010</controlpgno>
<printpgno>15</printpgno></pageinfo>while its boundaries were not yet defined, it was part of the immense territory included in the claim of Nicholas Perrot.  In the beginning, this document &ldquo;recites the origin and history of Perrot&apos;s authority; then tells how he and his companions entered the country; enumerates the tribes encountered on the banks of the upper Mississippi and its branches, the Wisconsin, St. Croix, and Minnesota; and takes possession of the whole region in the name of the king.&rdquo;</p>
<p>In 1695, Le Sueur established a post on one of the islands of the Mississippi, not far from the present town of Red Wing.  He also ascended the Minnesota river to the mouth of the Mankato, or Blue Earth river, about 150 miles above the site of Fort Snelling, where he erected another fort and established a trading-post.  Le Sueur explored the entire Blue Earth region.  With him the French discoveries in Minnesota appear to have ceased.  For half a century these enterprising Frenchmen had been penetrating into the country along the great water-courses, and establishing their trading-posts and forts at strategic points.  And yet the hold of the French upon the new territory was slight.  D&apos;Iberville, in a memorial addressed to the government, says:  &ldquo;The Sioux are too far removed for trade while they remain in their own country,&rdquo; and suggests a plan for their removal to the Missouri.  He also mentions the tendency of the voyageurs to become roaming hunters and the interference of Canadian traders with those of Louisiana, as great difficulties in the way of securing a stable system of commerce between the tribes and the latter colony.  However the French government heeded neither the advice of D&apos;Iberville nor the schemes of others; but discouraged by its ill success, abolished the system of licenses, and withdrew its garrisons from all the points west of Mackinaw.  This condition of affairs existed for nearly twenty years.  But, after all, this great territory was not to be relinquished or permanently neglected; for events were shaping themselves which revived the waning interest.</p>
<p>The eyes of the English were upon this part of the continent and they worked through the Indians to accomplish their designs.  A French document of the day thus refers to the matter:  &ldquo;It is more and more obvious that the English are endeavoring to interpolate among all the
<lb>
Indian nations, and to attach them to themselves.  They entertain constantly the idea of becoming masters of North America, pursuaded that the European nation which will be possessor of that section, will, in course of time, be masters of all, because it is there alone that men live in health and have strong, robust children.&rdquo;  &ldquo;Thus it came to pass,&rdquo; says Kirk in his history, &ldquo;that the song of the Canadian boatman was again heard on the streams and lakes of Minnesota, and the fathers of the mission once more performed their sacred ministrations within its borders.  But priest and voyageur were not left to battle alone; for the French authorities instituted means for the re-establishment of the deserted posts and the building of new ones.&rdquo;  During the period of struggle which followed, other parts of the territory to the westward were opened, and more adequate ideas of the extent and resources of the country obtained.  Previous to the breaking out of what is known in history as the &ldquo;French and Indian War,&rdquo; the dominion of France was reasserted and her power again became supreme.  And even though later, in 1763, the country was ceded to England by the treaty of Versailles, the French had so strong a hold upon the Indians that the English never established trading-posts west of Mackinaw.</p>
<p>An expedition was organized under English auspices by Jonathan Carver, a native of Connecticut, who had been a commander in the royal service during the French and Indian wars.  Leaving Boston in the month of June, 1766, he arrived at Mackinaw in the month of August.  Carver simply went over the routes that others had marked out and visited posts and villages already in existence.  He added nothing to the area of discovery; but he observed some things in his travels that had escaped the eyes of others, and has given us information that we find nowhere else.  He was the first one who called the attention of the civilized world to the existence of earthworks or mounds in the valley of the Mississippi.  He discovered the cave which bears his name, some miles below the city of St. Paul&mdash; a cave whose sides were carved with Indian hieroglyphics.  He tells us that the little island now below the Falls of St. Anthony was then in the middle of the cataract.  He describes the picturesque beauty of the country around the falls; he 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129011">011</controlpgno>
<printpgno>16</printpgno></pageinfo>foresees something of the future greatness of this region.  &ldquo;The future population,&rdquo; he declares, &ldquo;will be able to carry their produce to the seaports with great facility, the current of the river from its source to its entrance into the Gulf of Mexico, being extremely favorable for doing this in small craft.  This might also in time be facilitated by canals or shorter cuts, and a communication opened by water with New York by way of the lakes.&rdquo;  Carver went to England and interested a member of parliament by the name of Whithworth, in his projects, and would have returned to renew his travels had not the breaking out of the Revolutionary War prevented.  Nothing future of importance was accomplished until after that portion of Minnesota lying east of the Mississippi came into possession of the United States, by the Treaty of Paris, 1783.  And this event opens a new chapter in the history of Minnesota and of the Northwest Territory.</p></div>
<div>
<head>III.
<lb>
THE TRANSITION PERIOD.</head>
<p>We have just seen that by the treaty of Paris, that portion of what is now the state of Minnesota, which lay cast of the Mississippi, was ceded to the United States.  The French-American territory, assigned to Spain in 1763, was returned to France in 1880, and by the French, almost immediately after, ceded to the United States; so that the immense domain west of the Mississippi, including the other part of our present state, also came into the hands of the government.  But as yet no boundaries are defined.</p>
<p>This whole region, at the beginning of the present century, was just emerging from savagery.  The Indians still remained and had always to be reckoned with.  The French were still an important factor in the sparse population.  Halfbreeds abounded.  English traders were in possession of the posts.  For some years after the country had come into American ownership, the English kept their garrisons in the fort along the frontier; they even went so far as to erect new trading-post which floated the English colors.  The traders sought to hold the Indians loyal to British rile and to embitter them against the new regime.</p>
<p>The authorities at Washington found it necessary to become acquainted with the new soil, curb the insolence of the British traders, and conciliate the savage tribes.  The first mission of this kind was undertaken by Lieutenant Pike in 1805.  &ldquo;With his small command of twenty men,&rdquo; says General Sibley, &ldquo;he penetrated into the midst of the powerful tribes of the Dakotah and Chippewa Indians, arrested their hostile movement towards each other, negotiated a treaty of cession with the former, threatened evil-disposed tribes and Indians with punishment, tore down the British flag wherever displayed, and elicited the respect and admiration of savages who were entirely under British influence, and who had but a faint knowledge of the power of the American government.&rdquo;  As a result of his work, our government acquired from the Dakotahs the first tract of land cede by an Indian tribe within the limits of new territory.  Notwithstanding all that had been accomplished by Lieutenant Pike, the traders, during the war of 1812, enlisted the Indians upon the side of England.  They assisted in the attacks upon Fort Mackinaw in 1812, Fort Meigs in 1813, and Fort Shelby in 1814.  Only tow chiefs of the Dakotahs remained loyal to the Americans.  The results of the war were disappointing to the Indians, as the English had made them golden promises they were unable to fulfill; and these wild children of the forest learned to despite the power and authority of the United States no longer.</p>
<p>The expedition of Major Stephen H. Long in 1817 resulted in the selection of the present site of Fort Snelling, where three years later the corner-stone of that military structure was laid.  The post was at first called Fort St. Anthony, but through the influence of General Winfield Scott, who was there on a visit of inspection in 1824, the name was changed according to the following recommendation:  &ldquo;The work of which the War Department is in possession of the plans, reflects the greatest credit on Colonel Snelling, his officers and men.  The defenses, and for the most part the public storehouses, shops and quarters, being constructed of stone, the whole is likely to endure so long as the post shall remain a frontier one.  I wish to suggest to the general-in-chief, and through him to the War Department, the propriety of calling this work Fort 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129012">012</controlpgno>
<printpgno>17</printpgno></pageinfo>Snelling, as a just compliment to the meritorious warrior under whom it has been erected.&rdquo;</p>
<p>While the fort was building, the Arts of Peace were also being cultivated.  The seeds of a future civilization were being sown.  In 1821,the Northwestern and Hudson Bay Fur Companies&mdash;hitherto at war&mdash;united, and the Columbia Fur Company, with headquarters at Lake Traverse, was formed.  The first mills erected on Minnesota soil were built by the government at the Falls of St. Anthony, in 1821 and 1823 to manufacture flour and lumber for the garrison at Fort Snelling.  This latter year also witnessed the beginning of steam navigation on the waters of the upper Mississippi.  During the same year, the first distinctively scientific expedition entered Minnesota, under the direction of Major Long.  Among the explorers were Samuel Seymour, artist; Professor W. H. Keating, of Pennsylvania University, mineralogist and geologist, and Thomas Say, of the Philadelphia Academy of Sciences, zoologist and antiquarian.  It is said that, &ldquo;the scientific observations, though rapidly taken, were of great value.  The geological and geographical descriptions of the Minnesota and Red rivers were particularly interesting; and to these some information was added relative to the fauna and flora of those valleys.&rdquo;  Still later, the labors of Nicollet, in these directions, were important.  Progress was also being made in the management of the Indians.  On the 19th of August, 1825, the Northwestern tribes met at Prairie du Chien, where the government was represented by Lewis Cass, of Michigan, and Governor Clarke of Missouri.  The Dakotahs and Ojibways here consented to have definite bounds placed between their hunting-grounds, to prevent future contention.  The year following, Mr. Cass attended a council of the Ojibways of Fond du Lac.  On the 5th of August a treaty was sealed in which &ldquo;the Ojibways promised to sever all allegiance to Great Britain, and acknowledge at all times the United States&apos; supremacy.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Still further progress towards the coming civilization must now be noted.  The year 1833 marks the beginning of schools and missions among the Protestants.  They originated with Rev. W. T. Boutwell, among the Ojibways at Leech Lake.  In 1834, S. W.  Pond and his brother opened a mission for the Dakotahs at Lake Calhoun.  In
<lb>
June, 1835, a Presbyterian church was organized at Fort Snelling.  In 1836, Dr. Williamson, Mr. Higgins and Miss Poage, located at Lac qui Parle and organized a church.  In 1837, they were joined by Rev. S. R. Riggs and wife.  These were the humble beginnings.  The toils and sacrifices of these first teachers and missionaries laid the foundations for the work of others.  On these foundations schools and churches have multiplied.</p>
<p>The year 1837, eventful in the history of missions, is also eventful in commercial history.  Outside capital began to flow towards the Northwest and towards this particular spot of the Northwest.  A council of the Ojibways, held at Fort Snelling, this year, ceded to the United States all the pine lands of the St. Croix and its tributaries.  &ldquo;Capitalists immediately began to improve the water power at the Falls of St. Croix and this was the beginning of the now extensive manufacturing of lumber, so closely related to the commercial welfare of the state.  The Palmyra, Captain Holland commander, the first steamer to navigate the St. Croix, brought the machinery for the projected mills.  A delegation of the Dakotahs at Washington also ceded to the government all their Minnesota lands east of the Mississippi.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The principal event in the closing part of this period was the founding of St. Paul, in 1840.  A chapel of that name was first erected, and a small village sprang up around it.  Dr. Williamson, writing in 1843, gives a description of the settlement as it then appeared:  &ldquo;My present residence is on the utmost verge of civilization, in the northwest part of the United States, within a few miles of the principal village of white men in the territory that we suppose will bear the name of Minnesota.  The village referred to has grown up within a few years in a romantic situation, on a high bluff of the Mississippi, and has been baptised by the Roman Catholics with the name of St. Paul.  They have erected in it a small chapel, and constitute much the larger portion of its inhabitants.  The Dakotahs call it Im-ni-jas-ka, or &lsquo;White Rock,&rsquo; from the color of the sandstone which forms the bluff on which the village stands.  The village contains five stores, as they call them, at all of which intoxicating drinks form a part, and I suppose the principal part, of what they 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129013">013</controlpgno>
<printpgno>18</printpgno></pageinfo>sell.  I would suppose the village contains a dozen or twenty families living near enough to send to school.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The period condensed into these few paragraphs, to use the words of Mr. Kirk, &ldquo;May well be called the period of transition between the times of the voyageurs and the settlements; of romantic adventure, yielding to scientific research; of slowly shifting scenes in th prologue of yet another great drama of modern American life, for which the forces of civilization were steadily arranging themselves while the outside world began to look with eyes of eager expectancy for the opening of the first act.&rdquo;</p></div>
<div>
<head>IV.
<lb>
THE TERRITORY.</head>
<p>That part of Minnesota lying west of the Mississippi came successively under the jurisdiction of Louisiana Province in 1803, Louisiana territory in 1805, Missouri territory in 1812, Michigan territory in 1834, Wisconsin territory in 1836 and Iowa territory in 1838.  The part east of thee Mississippi secured, as already mentioned, by the treaty of Paris, belonged to the Northwest territory in 1787, Indiana territory in 1800, Illinois territory in 1809, Michigan territory in 1834, and Wisconsin territory in 1836.</p>
<p>Territory after territory, state after state, was organized out of this immense domain.  Finally, in 1848, Wisconsin, with boundaries not so inclusive as those of Wisconsin territory, was admitted as a state.  The act was passed on the 29th of May.  The following July, a meeting was held at St. Paul which &ldquo;proposed the calling of a convention to consider the steps proper to be taken by those citizens of the old Wisconsin territory beyond the boundaries of the new state of Wisconsin.&rdquo; The first public meeting for this purpose was held August 5th, at Stillwater, and Franklin Steele and Henry H. Sibley were the only ones who attended from the west side of the Mississippi.  At this time a call was issued for a general convention to meet at the same place on the 26th of the same month.  Sixty-two delegates were present and Henry H. Sibley was appointed to proceed to Washington and urge the immediate passage of a bill for the organization of Minnesota territory.&rdquo;  In the meantime, Mr.
<lb>
Sibley was elected to the House of Representatives, and finally succeeded in having a bill passed for the organization of the territory of Minnesota, with the present boundaries, and St. Paul as the capital.  On March 3, the bill was signed by the president.  Mr. Sibley will always be remembered for this service.  He had to battle hard in the House.  The measure was opposed on various pretexts, and hampered with embarrassing amendments.  An effort was made to append the Wilmot Proviso.  &ldquo;By great exertions on the part of myself and my friends,&rdquo; says Mr. Sibley, &ldquo;the House was at length persuaded to recede from its amendment.&rdquo;  The news was brought to St. Paul by the first packet-boat of the season, which ploughed its way through the icy river in early April.  There was great rejoicing in the new capital.  A few days later, James M. Goodhue appeared with his printing press and established the &ldquo;Pioneer,&rdquo; the first newspaper in the territory.</p>
<p>Alexander Ramsey, of Harrisburg, Pa., was appointed governor by the president.  He arrived before the close of April, and June 1 issued his firs proclamation, declaring the new government duly organized and directing all citizens to hold themselves obedient to its laws.  Three judicial districts were formed:  The first was the old county of St. Croix; the second, the northeast section, or La Pointe county, north of the Minnesota and the right line drawn westward from its headwaters to the Missouri; the third, comprised the remaining region to the south and westward of the former stream.  Stillwater, St. Anthony Falls, and Mendota, were the places in which the respective courts were held.  In July, the governor proclaimed the division of the territory into seven council districts, and issued an order for the first election of members of the council, representatives of the house, and a delegate to congress.  The congressional election resulted in the choice of Henry H. Sibley.  At this time the population of the territory was only 4,680; but the eyes of multitudes from all parts of the country were beginning to turn towards the Star of the North.</p>
<p>The first legislature convened September 3, 1849.  The sessions were held in the Central House, which served the double purpose of capitol and hotel.  &ldquo;On the first floor of the main building,&rdquo; says Neil, &ldquo;was the secretary&apos;s office and representative chamber, and in the second 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129014">014</controlpgno>
<printpgno>19</printpgno></pageinfo>story was the library and council chamber.  As the flag was run up the staff in front of the house, a number of Indians sat on a rocky bluff in the vicinity and gazed at what to them was a novel and perhaps saddening scene.&rdquo;  The new territory is now fully organized and all the machinery of government is in motion.</p>
<p>Under the administration of Governor Ramsey, immense progress was made.  The first legislature created the following counties:  Itasca, Wabasha, Dakotah, Wahnatah, Mankato, Pembina, Washington, Ramsey, and Benton.  Before the close of 1849, the citizens of St. Paul were considering the establishment of the first public school in the territory.  Treaties were made with the Indians in 1850 and 1851, by which they relinquished their titles to large areas of the territory to make way for the advancing tide of immigration.  The summer of 1850 witnessed the beginning of navigation of the Minnesota river.  Meanwhile the capital city was growing.  About this time, Fredericka Bremer, the Swedish novelist, wrote:  &ldquo;The town is one of the youngest of the great West, scarcely eighteen months old, and yet it has, in a short time, increased to a population of two thousand persons, and in a very few years it will certainly be possessed of twenty-two thousand.  As yet, however, the town is but in its infancy, and people manage with such dwellings as they can get.  The drawing-room at Governor Ramsey&apos;s house is also his office, and Indians and work people, ladies and gentlemen, are alike admitted.  The city is thronged with Indians.  The men, for the most part, go about grandly ornamented, with naked hatchets, the shafts of which serve them as pipes.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The second legislature, which met in 1851, made St. Paul the permanent capital, located the territorial prison at Stillwater, and established the University of Minnesota at St. Anthony Falls.  The third legislature, in 1852, created the county of Hennepin.  At this time settlements were made at Shakopee, Traverse des Sioux, Kasota and Mankato, in th Minnesota valley; and the largest one of all was made in the valley of the Rollingstone at Winona.  So rapidly was the new territory filling with settlers, so great were the strides in material progress, that when Governor Ramsey in 1853 addressed the fourth legislative assembly, he said:  &ldquo;In concluding my last annual message
<lb>
permit me to observe that it is now a little over three years and six months since it was my happiness to first land upon the soil of Minnesota.  Not far from where we now are a dozen frame houses not all complete, with some eight or ten log buildings, with bark roofs, constituted the capital of the new territory, over whose destiny I had been commissioned to preside.  One county, a remnant from Wisconsin territorial organization, alone afforded the ordinary facilities for the execution of the laws; and in and around its seat of justice resided the bulk of our scattered population.  Within this single county were embraced all the lands white men were privileged to till, while between them and the broad, rich hunting-grounds of untutored savages rolled the River of Rivers.  * * * The few bark-roofed huts have been transformed into a city of thousands.  In forty-one months, have condensed a whole century of achievements, calculated by the old world&apos;s calendar of progress&mdash;a government proclaimed in the wilderness, a judiciary organized, a legislature constituted, a comprehensive code of laws digested and adopted, our population quintupled, cities and towns springing up on every hand, and steam, with its revolving arms, in its season, daily fretting the bosom of the Mississippi, in bearing fresh crowds of men and merchandise within our borders.  Nor is that least among the important achievements of this brief period, which had enabled us, by extinguishing the Indian title to forty million acres of land, to overleap the Father of Waters, and plant civilization on his western shore.&rdquo; </p>
<p>Franklin Pierce had now become president of the United States, and following strictly the principle that to the victors belong the spoils, he removed Governor Ramsey and appointed as his successor Willis A. Gorman, of Indiana, a Kentuckian by birth, who had served as an officer in the Mexican war.  This year Henry M. Rice was elected to congress in place of Henry H. Sibley.  The fifth legislature met in 1854, and Governor Gorman, in his first annual message, urged &ldquo;speedy legislation in behalf of education, and the construction of railroads to meet the constantly increasing demands for transportation towards the eastern seaboards.&rdquo;  The question of railroad construction soon became the all-absorbing topic of the hour.  The bill, incorporating the Minnesota 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129015">015</controlpgno>
<printpgno>20</printpgno></pageinfo>&amp; Northwestern Railroad Company, was passed during the last moments of the legislative session.  In their anxiety to foster commercial interests, the legislature had promised to grant this company &ldquo;all lands which should thereafter be given Minnesota by the national government to aid in constructing railroads, as well as all those lands of that character then possessed by the territory.&rdquo;  This action of the legislature was destined to prove a source of contention for many years.  In this same year, 1854, the survey of the original town of Minneapolis was made.</p>
<p>In 1855 the wire suspension bridge across the Mississippi, between St. Anthony and Minneapolis, was completed&mdash;the first bridge that ever spanned the great river.  The 29th of March, this same year, witnessed the formation of the republican party.  The year 1857 was marked by some Indian atrocities in the southwestern part of the terrtory.  The whole section was in terror.  Soldiers from Fort Ridgely were sent to the scene of slaughter.  They found and buried thirty dead bodies, but the murderers were never captured.  The contempt which the Indian learned for the soldier and the power he represented, had its influence later in the terrible uprising of 1862.</p>
<p>Through all these years&mdash;years of creating counties, of building towns, of acquiring land for agricultural purposes, of founding schools and universities&mdash;the territory is steadily moving forward towards the state.  On the 26th of February, 1857, the United States senate passed an act &ldquo;enabling the people of Minnesota to form a state constitution previous to its admission into the Union.  By this act the boundaries of the state were defined as at present, and it was granted lands for the support of schools and the erection of public buildings.&rdquo;  By another act of the same session &ldquo;alternate sections of land were granted for the construction of railroads within the state.&rdquo;  Governor Gorman immediately called an extra session of the legislature; but before it convened, President Buchanan appointed Samuel Medary to take his place as governor.  A constitutional convention agreed upon a constitution for the coming state, August 29; and October 13 it was ratified by almost unanimous vote of the citizens.  On the 7th of April, 1858, the bill for the admission of Minnesota was carried, and on the 11th of
<lb>
May was signed by the president.  Thus Minnesota entered the great sisterhood of states; and a new star was placed upon the national banner.</p></div>
<div>
<head>V.
<lb>
THE STATE.</head>
<p>Dark and troubled was the time when Minnesota entered upon her career as a state, and nearly the whole of the first decade of state history was a period of depression and discouragement.  The panic of 1857 had made it almost impossible for the new commonwealth to negotiate loans for the development of its resources.  Then, there were mistakes in legislation than produced evil consequences in after years.  For example, the first legislature (1858) pledged the public credit to the amount of five million dollars &ldquo;to further subsidize the delinquent railroad companies.&rdquo;  The constitution of the state was amended so as to permit this to be done.  Governor Sibley refused to issue the bonds, but was compelled to do so by a mandamus of the Supreme Court.  More than two millions of dollars worth of bonds were then thrown upon the market, although not a rail of the projected road had been laid.  Then came the Civil War in 1861, and the Sioux outbreak in 1862.  Calamities followed thick upon the heels of blunders, and it was not until after the close of the war that the state began her real career.</p>
<p>We must not conclude, however, that there were no bright spots in this period of our history.  This first state legislature passed the act creating our present Normal Schools at Winona, Mankato and St. Cloud.  In lieu of better transportation facilities, an overland route was opened, June, 1859, between St. Paul and Breckenridge, on the Red River.  From this point a steamer carried goods to the Hudson Bay Company&apos;s territory.  The failure of the railroad companies to keep their pledges could not wholly check the spirit of enterprise.  But the attention paid to educational matters is one of the most significant things of this early day.  We have just mentioned the establishment of normal schools.  In the fall of 1859, Alexander Ramsey, first governor of the territory, was elected second governor of the state.  One of the first incidents of his administration was the repeal of the old act establishing 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129016">016</controlpgno>
<printpgno>21</printpgno></pageinfo>a territorial university, and on the basis of a new grant from congress, the founding of the State University of to-day.  Acts were also passed regulating the sale of the public school lands, of which &ldquo;there were two sections in each township exclusively devoted to the support of the lower or common schools, besides the special grants made in favor of the higher education.&rdquo;  The founders of Minnesota realized that the prosperity and glory of a state must be based upon the education of its children.</p>
<p>During Governor Ramsey&apos;s first term, the Civil War began; and while the struggle was at its height, and thousands of citizens away from their homes on the fields of battle, the Sioux perpetrated their bloody massacres.  It was a black and stormy time.  So far as the Civil War is concerned, it is a matter of record of which we may be justly proud, that Minnesota led the van in the great conflict for the preservation of the Union.  Governor Ramsey was in Washington when the flag waved over Suruter was fired upon.  Before the sun went down on that fateful day, he had offered&mdash;first of all the governors&mdash;the aid of the state troops, and President Lincoln had accepted.  The news was flashed to the capital of Minnesota; the lieutenant governor at once issued a proclamation, and by the 21st of June the First Minnesota fully organized and equipped, under command of Col. W. A. Gorman, started for the seat of war.  From time onward to Lee&apos;s surrender, the Minnesota troops were potent factors in the armies of the North.  Twenty-five thousand and fifty-two, all told, the settlers of Minnesota numbered who enlisted in the cause of freedom and union.  Minnesota regiments fought in every great battle of the long contest.  The First Minnesota won its initial honors in the first battle of Bull Run; then down to the second battle of Fredericksburg, down to Gettysburg, down to Appomattox, where many of its original members took part in the closing fight, all along the course of the war the noted regiment made memorable record.  The Minnesota sharpshooters were at Malvern Hill, Antietam and Fredericksburg.  The Fourth and Fifth regiments won honorable distinction at Shiloh and Corinth.  The Fifth was at the siege of Vicksburg.  The Fifth, Seventh, Ninth and Tenth regiments, under Gen. A. J. Smith, helped to defeat Forest at Tulepo,
<lb>
Mississippi.  They afterwards fought at Tallahatchie and pursued the retreating rebels under Price.  The Second regiment helped to storm the enemy&apos;s works on the summit of Mission Ridge, and was with the first battery in the Atlanta campaign.  Space will not permit us to enter more fully into detail.  Among the first on the theater of war, among the last to leave the scene, the troops of Minnesota added lustre to the name of the state; though for the time material interests languished and industrial progress was checked.  When the life of the nation was at stake, all other considerations might well be subordinated.</p>
<p>While thousands of citizens were away fighting for the union, suddenly, in 1862, the Sioux descended upon many of the unprotected settlements and perpetrated a massacre appalling even for savages.  Many reasons have been assigned for this bloody uprising, and there were doubtless many causes at work.  There was delay in the payment of annuities; many of the Indians had insufficient food in the meantime; there were some encroachments of settlers upon Indian reservations; there was ill-feeling between the unconverted Indians and those under missionary influence; but above and beyond all, perhaps, was the desire to regain their lost territory and reconquer the land from the whites.  This desire was fostered by the predictions of their medicine men that the Sioux would defeat the Americans in battle and again occupy the country, after clearing it of the whites.  Secret leagues had been formed among the warriors.  The wished-for end had long been considered.  All things seemed to indicate that the time was ripe.  Thousands of young and able-bodied men were away helping to crush the rebellion.  They remembered, too, these Indians, that no steps had been taken by the government to punish Ink-pa-du-tah and his band, and this fact was interpreted as weakness.  Thus the way was prepared, and conditions seemed favorable.  The first blow was struck at Acton, in Meeker county, where five persons were remorselessly slaughtered.  The next day the general work of murder, under Little Crow, began, at the agencies and spread through the surrounding country, until terror reigned supreme through the valley of the Minnesota.  &ldquo;The unarmed men of the settlements,&rdquo; says Capt. Charles Bryant, 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129017">017</controlpgno>
<printpgno>22</printpgno></pageinfo>&ldquo;offered no defense and could offer none, but fled before the savage horde, each in his own way, to such place as the dictates of self-preservation gave the slightest hope of safety.  Some sought the protection of the nearest slough; others crawled into the tall grass, hiding in many instances in sight of the lurking foe.  Children of tender years, hacked and beaten and bleeding, fled from their natural protectors, now dead or disabled, and by aid of some trail of blood, or by the instincts of our common nature, fled away from fields of slaughter, cautiously crawling by night from the line of smoke and fire in the rear, either towards Fort Ridgely or some town on the Minnesota or the Mississippi.  Over the entire border of the state, and even near the populus towns on the river, an eye looking down from above could have seen a human avalanche of thirty thousand, of all ages, and in all possible plight, the rear ranks maimed and bleeding and faint from starvation and the loss of blood, continually falling into the hands of inhuman savages, keen and fierce on the trail of the white man.&rdquo;  The uprising was promptly met by the governor, who at once sent Gen. Sibley to the scene of massacre.  After a successful campaign the decisive battle was fought at Wood Lake, not far from the upper agency at the ford of the Yellow Medicine.  Within a month from the first blow struck by the Sioux, their hopes vanished in smoke from the white man&apos;s guns, their white captives were restored to friends and three hundred of their guilty tribesmen had been taken.  These criminals were tried by a military commission and condemned to death, but President Lincoln commuted the sentences of all but thirty-eight, who were hung at Mankato on the 26th of December.  The following year (1863) under the administration of Governor H. A. Swift, Gen. Sibley drover the remaining hostile Sioux from the state and they fled beyond the Missouri.  The same year the notorious Little Crow, who had ventured back, was shot by a young settler named Chauncey Lampson, in the Big Woods, six miles from Hutchinson.  Thus ended one of the saddest chapters in the history of the young commonwealth.</p>
<p>The year 1865 marks the close of the war.  The surviving troops return to take up again the avocations of peace. The Indian question is settled,
<lb>
and immigration turns once more toward the North Star state.  A new era begins with the administration of Governor W. R. Marshall, extended through two successive terms.  Educational and charitable institutions are founded.  The first hospital for the insane is located at St. Peter.  Buildings for the school for deaf, dumb and blind are erected at Faribault.  The normal institute at Winona is finished.  The reform school is founded.  The state is brought into line with the results of the Civil War, by striking the word &ldquo;white&rdquo; from the constitution.  It is an epoch of railroad construction.  Grants of land for the Southern Minnesota and the Hastings &amp; Dakota are made.  The Northern Pacific is begun.  The right of the state to 500,000 acres of land for internal improvements is established.  &ldquo;I am profoundly grateful,&rdquo; says Governor Marshall, in his last message, &ldquo;to the Providence that connected me with the state government during so interesting and prosperous a period.&rdquo;  Under his successor, Governor Horace Austin, there was a steady and rapid growth of the commonwealth.  Immigration increased, railroad construction was pushed with vigor, and real state rose rapidly in value.  Several important amendments to the constitution signalize Governor Austin&apos;s term of office.  One provided for increasing the public debt of the state to maintain more effectively our charitable institutions.  Another prevented any city or village or county from gaining a bonus of more than ten per cent of its property valuation to any railroad asking for aid.  (This was subsequently made five per cent.)  Still another amendment preserved the sale of internal improvement lands at the rate obtained for school lands, and provided for the investment of funds so obtained in United States and Minnesota state bonds.  The administration of Cushman K. Davis (elected in 1873), was characterized by railroad legislation.  The regulation of rates and the relation of the railroad to the public, were freely discussed.  Governor Davis himself says:  &ldquo;The most important political event of my administration was undoubtedly the culmination of the controversy which had been carried on for some years between the railroad companies and the people, on the question of the legislative power to control the former in the performance of their duties towards the public, especially in regard to fixing rates for transportation.&rdquo; 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129018">018</controlpgno>
<printpgno>23</printpgno></pageinfo>The result was a statute authorizing the governor to appoint a commission of three, &ldquo;who had power to fix the rates of the various companies within the state.&rdquo;  During Governor Davis; term of office the state was divided into judicial districts and women were granted the right of suffrage in school elections.</p>
<p>In 1875, John S. Pillsbury was elected.  He held the position for three successive terms, having been twice-re-elected.  During his administration the amendment to the constitution was passed forbidding the use of school funds for the support of sectarian schools (1877), and the question of railroad bonds was finally and honorably settled (1882.)  Selah Chamberlain, in behalf of himself and a majority of the holders of railroad bonds, offered to make a settlement, taking new bonds of half the face value of the old.  An extra session of the legislature decided to accept Mr. Chamberlain&apos;s offer.  Governor Pillsbury will always be remembered with gratitude for insisting upon maintaining the credit of the state, against a strong and persistent sentiment of repudiation.  His own words deserve to be recorded here:  &ldquo;In my opinion, no public calamity, no visitation of grasshoppers, no wholesale destruction or insidious pestilence, could possibly inflict so fatal a blow upon our state as the deliberate repudiation of her solemn obligations. * * *  With the loss of public honor, little could remain worthy of preservation.&rdquo;  Governor Pillsbury has in many ways done much for the state of his adoption; but his firm and noble stand for the public credit of itself entitles him to the respect of coming generations.</p>
<p>The administration of Governor Lucius F. Hubbard (elected in 1881), covers two terms, during which schools of every grade were multiplied and public charities flourished, while the material prosperity of the state continued to grow.  To use his own words:  &ldquo;In population, wealth and the development of all the industries of our people, Minnesota made a decided advance during 1882 and 1883.  The extension of our railroad system, particularly the completion of the Northern Pacific Railroad, gave a decided impetus to our commercial centers.  The adoption of more diversified methods infused new life into our agricultural interests, and with large accessions to our population, and active capital, all industrial
<lb>
pursuits felt the inspiration of a healthy and substantial progress.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Andrew R. McGill succeeded Mr. Hubbard.  In 1887 a system of high license was adopted by the state for those places that do not prohibit liquor selling under the local option law, fixing the license at $1,000 for cities of 10,000 inhabitants and over, for all other places half that sum.  One-third of all the saloons in the state went out of business, while from the remainder the state received 50 per cent more revenue than previously from the entire number.  The act creating the railroad commission, under Governor Davis, was repealed and a new act was passed which embodied many of the provisions of the old and added new features.  Among these were provisions to prevent rebates and pooling, requiring charges to be equal and reasonable, to prevent hindrances to through transportation and undue discrimination for longer or shorter hauls.  Other acts were passed requiring all railroads, not subject to special tax laws, to pay a percentage of their gross earnings in lieu of taxes; forbidding the sale of watered stock, and making companies liable for the negligence of their servants.  During this year, in spite of this stringent legislation, 196 miles of railroad were built in the state.  In 1888 a fourth normal school was established at Moorhead, and the buildings of the Soldiers&apos; Home, provided for by an act of the previous year, were completed near Minnehaha Falls on a site provided by the city of Minneapolis.  The Farm and Labor party, whose influence was to be increasingly felt in politics, was organized August 28 of this year, at St. Paul.</p>
<p>The next governor was William R. Merriam, who began his term of office in 1889.  At the first session of the legislature W. D. Washburn was elected to the United States senate to succeed Dwight M. Sabin.  The Australian system of voting was adopted for all cities of 10,000 inhabitants or over.  The Supreme Court pronounced the legislation of the preceding administration regulating railway charges, unconstitutional.  &ldquo;Railroads,&rdquo; said the Court, &ldquo;are entitled to a judicial determination of the facts whether the rates established are just and reasonable&rdquo;&mdash;a right denied them under the law.  At the close of Governor Merriam&apos;s second term in 1892, the finances of the state were in a sound and prosperous 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129019">019</controlpgno>
<printpgno>24</printpgno></pageinfo>condition.  Progress was everywhere being made. The population was rapidly increasing.  Business corporation were multiplying.  New territory was being settled.  Manufactures flourished.  Prosperity reigned.</p>
<p>The administration of Knute Nelson began in 1893. During this year gold was discovered in Minnesota.  Special Agent Gray, in his report, says:  &ldquo;One vein with evidence of gold, which is about seven feet wide and extends throughout the length of the island, and another ten feet wide and 1,700 feet long, were found.  The section embraces only a narrow strip, extending along the shore of Rainy Lake for about twenty-five miles, and not more than three or four miles wide at any point, including a large number of islands.&rdquo;  This year is also made memorable by the opening of the transcontinental line of the Great Northern in June.  The event was celebrated with great rejoicing in St. Paul.  The road is operated in connection with a fleet of Pacific steamers.  The northern part of Minnesota was this year visited by forest fires that rendered 2,000 people homeless.  An International Reciprocity Convention was held in St. Paul June 5, between representatives of the United States and Canada.  Resolutions were passed favoring reciprocity in trade, improvement of the great lake to tide-water so as to admit the passage of ocean steamers and open competition between the railroads of both countries.  This year Minnesota was represented at the World&apos;s Fair Exposition in Chicago.  &ldquo;Besides its own building, the state had exhibits in all the general buildings.  The forestry and mining displays were particularly fine.  More than 200 awards were received for cereals, with only a little more than 300 samples shown; 40 for mining exhibits, 66 for four.  Fifty premiums were received for draught horses, 48, for cattle and 21 for poultry.&rdquo;  During the legislative session of Mr. Nelson&apos;s first term, Cushman K. Davis was elected to succeed himself in the United States senate.  Bills were passed appropriating money for a new capitol, placing the State University on a more independent footing by a slight increase in taxation, extending the benefit of state inspection of grain to the farmer and granting them the right to erect elevators on railroad right of way, providing for safeguards to all dangerous machinery, and placing all manufacturing and other establishment
<lb>
employing large number of people under the inspection of the Bureau of labor.  In 1894 forest fires again ravaged a large part of the state centering in the vicinity of Hinckley.  Over 400 lives were lost, many persons were maimed, 2,000 were left destitute and $1,000,000 of property was destroyed.  Prompt action was taken by a relief committee pointed by the governor and $25,000 were spent in providing for the needy.</p>
<p>Gov. Nelson was re-elected in 1894, but the legislature early in 1859 made him United States senator, and lieutenant governor, David M. Clough, too the governor&apos;s chair.  During 1895, $50,000 was appropriated to execute a stringent measure for the eradication of the Russian thistle, another $50,000 to continue the drainage of lands in the Red river Valley.  Some measures looking to road improvements also became laws.  The unsold lands of the defunct Hastings &amp; Dakota Railroad corporation to the extent of 55,000 acres, were declared forfeited.  A bounty of 1 cent per pound was offered on sugar made from sorghum or beet roots.  Some laws of importance to the cause of labor were passed.  Contract labor in prisons was done away, and provision made that the number of prisoners engaged in any productive occupation shall not exceed ten per cent of the free labor employed.  Children under fourteen are not to be employed in any factory, workshop or mine; nor hall any such child be employed outside of the family where he resides before 6 o&apos;clock in the morning or after 7 at night.  If under compulsory school age, he can not be employed anywhere during school hours.</p>
<p>With this year our sketch closes.  The panic of 1893 still continue, and business is prostrate.  But the history of the past encourages us to believe that the cloud will lift and prosperity return. The growth of the state has been marvelous.  Its resources, a we shall see, are almost without limit.  Its future is assured.</p></div>
<div>
<head>VI.
<lb>
RESOURCES OF MINNESOTA.</head>
<p>Let us now turn from contemplating the history of the past to examine the foundation upon which the future must be based.  What are our resources?  What has nature done for us?</p>
<p>First of all, let us speak of the soil.  &ldquo;Every factor in nature,&rdquo; says Prof. Snyder, of the State 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129020">020</controlpgno>
<printpgno>25</printpgno></pageinfo>University, &ldquo;seems to have at work in making the soils of Minnesota rich in plant food.  They are mainly drift soils derived from the very best rock materials, pulverized by the action of glaciers, and enriched for centuries by the natural workings of vegetable and animal life.  A great deal could be said about the fertility of Minnesota soil, but about the most convincing proof that can be given is the fact that the soils exhibited as spicemens at the Columbian Exposition received the award from the United States government for soils rich in plant foods.  The same authority also says; &ldquo;The fertility of the soils of the state has a marked effect upon the quality of the products.  In the case of wheat, the average amount of gluten in the wheat raised in the United States is 11.9 per cent.  The average amount of gluten in the wheat raised in Minnesota is 13.75 per cent.  Other crops are in the same proportion.  The crops raised on the rich soil of Minnesota have a greater food value than crops raised on the poor, worn soils of older countries.&rdquo;  It goes without saying that, in addition to wheat, all the other cereals produced in other lands can be grown in Minnesota.  The vegetables of other climates flourish here.  The fruits of the temperate zones, notwithstanding our sever winters, find here a congenial home.  The strawberry takes front rank in value of product; but large quantities of raspberries, blackberries, currants and gooseberries are also grown.  Minnesota also annually produces 185,000 bushels of apples, the number of trees growing at the present time being 452,665.  In 893, there were gathered from 77,4[50 vines, 83,839 pounds of grapes.  It must be borne in mind that vast areas of our territory are not yet under cultivation.  The number of acres that had been touched by the plow in 1894 was only 7,000,000; but the total government land not yet occupied&mdash;to say nothing of railroad lands&mdash;is 10,000,000 acres, greater in area than all ploughed land of Ireland and Scotland, equal to nearly one-half the cultivated area of New England, and to 70 percent of the total arable land of Old England.  Of those tracts about one-half are surveyed and ready for the homesteader.  These government lands lie, for the most part, in the northern portion of central Minnesota.  From its remarkable abundance of
<lb>
Lakes, rivers and forest, this section of the state is called the Lake Park Region of the Mississippi Valley.  When the railroad lands, in different localities, are taken into account, the total acreage yet awaiting the advent of the farmer is raised to 200,000,000.  The possibilities that lie hidden in this immense domain may be conjectured from the size and variety of the crops raised upon the cultivated fields.</p>
<p>In addition to agriculture and horticulture, stock-raising and wool-growing occupy much of the attention of the farmers of Minnesota; and a competent authority says:  &ldquo;There is room for the profitable development of the live stock industry to any extent that my be desired.&rdquo;  The climate is favorable, and food is easily and cheaply produced.  &ldquo;In nearly all parts of Minnesota and the Northwest, clover in one or the other of its forms may be successfully grown.  Soiling crops can be produced in great perfection.  Corn for feeding cattle can be grown right up the Canadian boundary line.  Millet finds a favorite home within the state, and the same is true of flax.  Mangels may be raised everywhere, and all kinds of cereals for stall feeding are plentiful and cheap.&rdquo;  As to sheep raising, &ldquo;In Minnesota there are some 160 varieties of native grasses and plants, a large proportion of which are suitable as food for sheep.  * * * There is great room for the extension of sheep husbandry in the state of Minnesota.&rdquo;  It is an industry which brings quick returns.  &ldquo;The first season after the investment, there is a return on wool.&rdquo;  In the spring of 1894, 1,347,052 pounds were sheared.</p>
<p>When we leave the sections cultivated or capable of cultivation and enter the forests, we begin to understand what is back of the lumber industry.  Nearly half of the northwestern portion of the state is or has been more or less covered with pine forests.  This comprises an area of 21,000 square miles.  &ldquo;The special hardwoods of Minnesota,&rdquo; says Mr. J. O. Barrett, &ldquo;known as the Big Woods, lie south and west of the coniferous district, extending within 50 or 60 miles of the international boundary, and south 300 miles and 20 or more miles wide.  This hardwood belt &mdash;largely red and white oak and hard maple&mdash;is on the extreme western body of timber of any considerable value east of the Rocky Mountains.&rdquo; 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129021">021</controlpgno>
<printpgno>26</printpgno></pageinfo>In 1894, nearly one billion feet of pine timber were cut, and about one hundred million feet of hardwood.</p>
<p>But there are resources within the soil as well as on top of it.  In 1894 Minnesota rose to the position of second state in Lake Superior region and even in the United States, in the production of iron ore.  The output of the mines in this year was 2,742,146 tons.  In 1896, Minnesota rose to the first position with an estimated output of 4,000,000 tons.  Her stone quarries are annually producing more and more building materials.  No later figures are at hand than those of the census of 1890; but these show that, while in 1880 there were only 41 quarries for all kinds of stone, whose total product was worth $255,818, in 1889, there were 102 quarries producing limestone, granite and sandstone valued at $1,102,008.  There is also wealth in the clay of certain localities; and bricks, sewer pipe and pottery are manufactured in large quantities.  The stoneware made at Red Wing alone amounts in capacity to 7,000,000 gallons annually.</p>
<p>This is but the merest suggestion of the resources of our state.  Space will not admit of further detail.  Only the principal industries have
<lb>
been named.  There are others that can not even be mentioned.  When we consider how brief has been the career of the state, how much has been accomplished in that short existence, what events have been crowded into it, what industries have been established, what territory put under cultivation, what products have been forced from the earth, and then survey the land yet to be possessed, we can only wonder what the future may be, what further strides will be taken.  The materials for greater development than has yet been attained are abundant.  We may well believe that they will be wisely used.  We have never yet forgotten the importance of education as our schools and university attest; nor of religion, as our churches witness.  And so long as the scheming brain and the skilled hand go forward side by side with culture and conscience, their achievements can not be too numerous or great.  &ldquo;As to the future of this great central district of North America,&rdquo; says Bancroft, &ldquo;no one who has not seen it can form an adequate conception, while those who have examined and studied the subject, only become sensible how much farther reason may sometimes go than imagination can venture to follow.&rdquo;</p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129022">022</controlpgno>
<printpgno>27</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>ALEXANDER RAMSEY.</head>
<p>Alexander Ramsey, one of the most distinguished citizen of Minnesota, was born near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, on September 8, 1815.  His father, Thomas Ramsey, was of Scotch descent, and his mother was of a German family which early i the Eighteenth century settled in Pennsylvania.  From his parents he inherited a strong constitution and a taste for study, which was developed during his boyhood by his schoolmaster, Isaac D. Rupp, who afterwards became prominent as a historical writer in Pennsylvania.  His father died when he was about ten years old, and Frederick Kelker, a grand uncle gave the orphan boy a home.  For a time he was employed in Mr. Kelker&apos;s store, and later he acted as clerk in the office of the register of deeds.  While engaged in these and other employments, young Ramsey was diligently pursuing his studies, and when eighteen years old was prepared to enter Lafayette College, at Easton, Pennsylvania.  In 1837 he left college and commenced studying law with the Hon. Hamilton Alricks, of Harrisburg, and two years later, when he was twenty-four years of age, he was admitted to the bar.  Within a short time he had established himself in practice at Harrisburg, and devoted himself largely to the settlement and administration of estates.  He became quite successful and secured a large clientage.  While paying strict attention to his business, he also found time to engage in the active political campaign of 1840, and in the following year he was elected chief clerk of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives.  In 1843 Mr. Ramsey was nominated and elected to congress from the district composed of Dauphin, Lebanon and Schuylkill Counties.  In congress Mr. Ramsey was a useful rather than ornamental member, making no attempt at oratorical display.  He exhibited unusual practical ability, and was noted for attending to the interests of his district In the following year he was again elected, and would undoubtedly have received a third term had he not declined a renomination.  On retiring from his congressional duties Mr. Ramsey resumed his law practice, but could not entirely withdraw from politics, for in the following year he was chosen chairman of the Whig
<lb>

<illus entity="i1912-001" map="no">
<caption>
<p>ALEXANDER RAMSEY</p></caption></illus>
state committee, during the important campaign which resulted in he election of Taylor as president.  This campaign also affected Mr. Ramsey&apos;s destinies to an important degree, for, in March, 1849, shortly after President Taylor cane into office, he appointed Mr. Ramsey governor of the Minnesota Territory, the recently established.  The appointment was accepted, and Mr. Ramsey at once came to St. Paul, arriving there on May 27, 1849.  Four days afterwards, the other territorial officers having arrived, he issued a proclamation, declaring the territory organized.  During that summer the governor was much occupied in the details of organization.  The territory was to be developed into legislative districts, elections were to be ordered, county officers appointed, the executive government put in order, and the affairs of the numerous tribes of Indians supervised.  The first territorial legislature, which convened in the following September, bestowed none of the first counties created the name of their new governor.  The first legislative body of Minnesota convened in two small rooms of a hotel on the banks of the Mississippi in St. Paul.  The governor read his first message to the joint convention of the two houses, twenty-seven members in all, assembled in the hotel dining-room.  Among the first 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129023">023</controlpgno>
<printpgno>28</printpgno></pageinfo>acts of Governor Ramsey were efforts in the direction of extinguishment of the Indian titles by treaty, and the negotiations made at Mendota, and at Traverse de Sioux in 1851, brought some forty million acres of what is now the most valuable portion of the state into settlement.  Later in the same year Governor Ramsey visited the Red River country, and at Pembina, made a treaty with the Northern Chippewas for the cession of thirty miles on each side of the Red river.  This treaty was not ratified by the senate, but some years later Governor Ramsey, then senator, made another treaty, accomplishing the same results, and thus threw the great Red River valley open to settlement.  In 1853, Governor Ramsey&apos;s term of office ended.  He gave his attention for some years to making investments and conducting business transactions, especially in St. Paul.  He was elected mayor of St. Paul in 1855, and when Minnesota was admitted to the Union, Governor Ramsey was nominated for state governor by the Republican party, but was not elected.  Two years later he was again nominated and received a handsome majority.  He entered his office on January 2, 1860.  At that time the state was in debt and the treasury was empty, taxes were difficult to collect, and there were many difficulties connected with the administration of a young state in war time, but the administration was successful.  At the time of the fall of Fort Sumter, Governor Ramsey was in Washington on official business.  Upon seeing the necessity for troops he at once called upon President Lincoln and tendered him a regiment of one thousand men from Minnesota.  This was the first offer by any state of armed troops to the government, the president not yet having issued his proclamation calling for troops.  During that year five regiments were recruited and equipped and sent to the front by the state of Minnesota.  Governor Ramsey was re-elected in the fall of 1861, and his second term was more important and more trying than the first.  There were repeated calls for troops from the government, and five regiments were recruited in 1862.  In the midst of this activity occurred the Sioux massacre in the southwestern part of the state.  With the rare executive ability which always characterized Governor Ramsey, he organized a battalion to go to the front to the relief of the
<lb>
besieged settlers.  The campaign was short and sharp, and the Indians were soon defeated and dispersed, never again to menace the Minnesota frontier.  In January, 1863, Governor Ramsey was elected United States senator from Minnesota, and in 1869, at the close of his term, he was re-elected for six years more.  His service in the senate was marked by the introduction of many important bills, including measures for the improvement of the Mississippi river, aiding of the Northern Pacific railroad, the repeal of the franking abuse, and various measures for the benefit of the Northwest.  Being chairman of the senate committee on postoffices he was especially interested in postal reforms.  In both houses of congress and among national leaders, Senator Ramsey won the highest regard and confidence of the best men.  For a few years after the close of his congressional term he enjoyed a period of rest from official life, but on December 10, 1879, President Hayes tendered him the portfolio of secretary of war.  This position he filled with much honor during the remainder of Hayes&apos; administration.  Under &ldquo;the Edmunds law,&rdquo; which created a commission of five to control the affairs of the polygamists in Utah, Senator Ramsey was appointed, in 1882, to serve on this board, and was elected its chairman.  He filled this position for four years, resigning in 1886.  It was his last public service.  During his long and active life as a public man in Minnesota, Governor Ramsey has been active in many movements for the benefit of his city and state not connected with official affairs.  He has been, since 1849, one of the most active members of the Minnesota Historical Society.  He is president and director of the St. Paul public library, and a leading member of the Old Settlers&apos; Association, and an honored member of he Minnesota Commandery, Loyal Legion.  On September 10, 1845, Governor Ramsey married Miss Anna Earl Jenks, a daughter of the Hon. Michael H. Jenks, a judge and congressman of Bucks County, Pennsylvania.  They had two sons, both of whom died in infancy, and one daughter, now Mrs. E. Furness.  Mrs. Ramsey, who was for forty years a conspicuous figure in social life, both in St. Paul and Washington, died on November 29, 1884, at the age of fifty-eight years.</p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129024">024</controlpgno>
<printpgno>29</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>AUSTIN HILL YOUNG.</head>
<p>Austin Hill Young served on the judicial bench of Hennepin County for more than eighteen years.  He was born at Fredonia, Chautauqua County, New York, December 8, 1830, the son of Abijah Young and Rachel Hill (Young).  His parents were natives of Vermont.  His father was a cabinet maker by occupation, a man in moderate financial circumstances, but a great reader and of considerable literary attainments.  His wife was a woman of strong personal character, an earnest Christian, who impressed herself deeply upon her children.  Soon after their marriage in Rutland County, Vermont, they removed to Fredonia, New York, where they resided until Abijah Young&apos;s death in 1837.  Mrs. Young believed that the new West would afford more favorable conditions under which to rear her family of five boys, and removed to Dupage County, Illinois.  Two years later she was married again and removed with her family to Cook County, where the subject of this sketch grew up on an Illinois farm.  Austin H. attended the common schools of the neighborhood in winter, working on the farm in summer.  At the age of seventeen he took a course at Waukegan Academy, Waukegan, Illinois, then one of the best schools of its kind in the West.  This, with the experience of six terms of school teaching, comprised his early educational advantages.  In 1853, at the age of twenty-three years, be began the study of law in the office of Ferry&amp; Clark, of Waukegan.  In 1854 he removed to Prescott, Wisconsin, and for a time was engaged in mercantile business.  He was also elected clerk of the circuit court and held that office for several years.  In 1860 he began the practice of law, forming a partnership with M. H. Fitch.  Soon afterward he was elected district attorney for his county, which office he held till the fall of 1863, when he was elected to the State Senate.  In 1866 Mr. Young removed to Minneapolis and began the practice of his profession here in partnership with W. D. Webb.  In the spring of 1870 he formed a partnership with Thomas Lowry, which continued until June 1, 1872, when he was appointed judge of the court of common pleas.  This court had recently been established by the legislature, and in November of the same year Judge Young was elected for a term of five
<lb>

<illus entity="i1912-002" map="no">
<caption>
<p>AUSTIN HILL YOUNG</p></caption></illus>
years.  In 1877 the Legislature united the district court and the court of common pleas and Judge Young was transferred to the district bench and was continued in that office until 1890, when he resumed the practice of law in Minneapolis, forming a partnership with Frank M. Nye.  That firm has since been dissolved, and Judge Young is now in partnership with Daniel Fish.  His continuance on the bench for eighteen years is in itself sufficient evidence of his ability, integrity and fidelity to his official duties.  He has long occupied a prominent and influential position in Minneapolis, where he is esteemed alike for his professional attainments and his high character.  In politics he is a Republican, but on account of his official position has not taken a very active part in party affairs.  He is a member of Plymouth Congregational Church and one of the officers of that society.  Judge Young was married in 1854 to Miss Martha Martin, at Waukegan, Illinois.  She died in 1868.  He was married again, and again lost his wife by death.  His present wife was Miss Leonora Martin, daughter of Milton Martin, of Williamstown, Vermont, to whom he was married April 9, 1872.  He has had five children, offspring of his first wife, two of whom, Edgar A., and Alice M., are still living.</p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129025">025</controlpgno>
<printpgno>30</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>A. R. McGILL</head>
<illus entity="i1912-003" map="no">
<caption>
<p>A. R. McGILL.</p></caption></illus>
<p>Andrew Ryan McGill, Governor of Minnesota during the years of 1887-88, is of Irish descent.  His father, Charles Dillon McGill, was the youngest son of Patrick McGill, who came from County Antrim, Ireland, about 1774.  He served in the struggle for independence, and after the war was over settled in Northumberland County, Pennsylvania.  With his wife and family emigrating in 1800 to the western part of the state, he there secured several hundred acres of land in what was subsequently organized as Crawford County.  This became the home of the McGills.  The first house was erected on the sight of Saegertown, where the subject of this sketch was born, Feb. 19, 1840.  Charles Dillon McGill married Angelina Martin, of Waterford, Pennsylvania, daughter of Armand Martin, a soldier of the war of 1812 and granddaughter of Charles Martin, a soldier of the Revolution, and after the war an officer of the Second United States infantry; but Andrew&apos;s mother died when her son was but 7 years of age, not, however, until she had made a deep impression upon his young mind.  She was a woman of strong character and high Christian living.  In 1840 Saegertown was a quaint, retired village in the secluded valley of the Venango, almost a stranger to the bustle
<lb>
and traffic of commerce.  Good schools, however, had been established, and Andrew McGill was given such educational advantages as was afforded by them.  He also attended Saegertown Academy, which completed the schooling received in his youthful days.  In 1859 he went to Kentucky where he secured a position as teacher, but it was just upon the outbreak of the war, and Kentucky did not afford a pleasant place of residence for a man of Northern sentiments.  In 1861, when the war broke out, times became more turbulent, and the successful prolongation of educational work was out of the question.  Mr. McGill then returned North and on June 10, 1861, arrived in Minnesota.  His education and experience qualified him for the position of teacher and he was made principal of the public schools of St. Peter.  But the country was calling for soldiers, and in August, 1862, he enlisted in Company D, Ninth Minnesota Volunteers, and became first sergeant in his company.  Before going South his regiment was sent to suppress the Indian outrages of that year.  The following year he was discharged on account of failing health, and soon afterward was elected County Superintendent of public schools for Nicollet County, and filled the position two terms.  In 1865 and 1866 he edited the St. Peter Tribune, a paper which he continued to publish for a number of years afterward.  He was also elected clerk of the district court of Nicollet County which position he held for four years devoting much of his time to the study of law under the direction of Hon. Horace Austin by whom he was admitted to the bar in 1868.  Two years later Judge Austin became governor of this state, and Mr. McGill was appoited his private secretary.  In 1873 he was chosen for the office of Insurance Commissioner for the state and discharged the duties of the office for thirteen years with great efficiency, his reports being accepted as among the most valuable issued on that subject.  In 1886 Mr. McGill was nominated for the office of Governor by the Republicans.  It was a critical time for his party; the temperance question cut a large figure, and the Republican party had declared in favor of local option and high license.  This was sufficient to array all Prohibitionists against the party and enlist all friends of the saloon solidly against the Republican ticket.  Governor McGill was a young man of unassailable 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129026">026</controlpgno>
<printpgno>31</printpgno></pageinfo>character and conducted his campaign upon a dignified plan.  He had for an opponent Dr. A. A. Ames, of Minneapolis, who had no difficulty in securing the support of all the liquor interests.  However, Mr. McGill was elected, and the records of his term of office show much accomplished.  Of the important measures enacted during his term of office were the high license law, the railroad laws relating to transportation, storage, wheat grading watering of railroad stock, et.  The temperance legislation was materially strengthened.  Amendments simplifying the tax laws, regulating the control of the liquor traffic, abolishing contracts detrimental to labor, establishing the Soldiers&apos; Home and the bureau of labor statistics were passed, the state reformatory was established and other measures of importance were undertaken during his administration.  On his retirement from office at the end of his two years&apos; term, he organized the St. Paul and Minneapolis Trust Company (now Northern Trust Company), of which he is president.  Mr. McGill is a resident of St. Anthony Park, a suburb of St. Paul, where he has a pleasant home.  He has been married twice.  His first wife was Eliza E. Bryant, daughter of Charles S. Bryant, a lawyer and an author of some prominence.  She died in 1877, survived by two sons and one daughter, Charles H., Robert C. and Lida B.  In 1880 Governor McGill married Mary E. Wilson, daughter of Dr. J. C. Wilson, of Edinborough, Pennsylvania, Her children are two sons, Wilson and Thomas.</p></div>
<div>
<head>THOMAS DILLON O&apos;BRIEN.</head>
<p>Thomas Dillon O&apos;Brien is a lawyer in St. Paul.  His father, Dillon O&apos;Brien, was an author and lecturer.  His mother&apos;s maiden name was Elizabeth Kelly.  His ancestors on both his father&apos;s and mother&apos;s side were Irish; people of education and good standing.  The subject of this sketch was born at La Point, Madeline Island, Lake Superior, Wisconsin, February 14, 1859.  In 1863 he with his parent moved to St. Anthony, Minnesota, and after a residence there of two years went to St. Paul.  Thomas attended the common schools, but was also assisted in his
<lb>

<illus entity="i1912-004" map="no">
<caption>
<p>THOMAS DILLON O&apos;BRIEN.</p></caption></illus>
education by instruction received from his parents.  In April, 1877, he began the study of law with Young &amp; Newell, at St. Paul.  After three years&apos; application to his studies he was admitted to the bar by the supreme court of the state on the 17th of April, 1880.  Shortly afterwards he became a member of the firm of O&apos;Brien, Eller &amp; O&apos;Brien, composed of John D. O&apos;Brien, Homer C. Eller and T. D. O&apos;Brien.  Subsequently he withdrew from the firm and formed a co-partnership with his brother, C. D. O&apos;Brien, under the firm name of C. D. and T. D. O&apos;Brien.  Mr. O&apos;Brien was assistant city attorney of St. Paul for several year, while W. P. Murray held the office of city attorney.  He was elected county attorney of Ramsey County in 1890, and served from January 1, 1891, to January 1, 1893, when he returned to his private practice, having declined a re-election.  Mr. O&apos;Brien has taken an active interest in the militia of the state, and was for two year captain of Battery &ldquo;A,&rdquo; of the Minnesota National Guard.  In polities he is a Democrat and an active participant in the promotion of the interests of his party.  He is a member of the Roman Catholic church.  Mr. O&apos;Brien was married April 24, 1888, at Philadelphia, to Miss Mary Cruice, daughter of Dr. W. R. Cruice, of that city.  They have four children, Nellie, Dillon, Louise and William R.</p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129027">027</controlpgno>
<printpgno>32</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>LOREN WARREN COLLINS</head>
<illus entity="i1912-005" map="no">
<caption>
<p>LOREN WARREN COLLINS.</p></caption></illus>
<p>Loren Warren Collins is associate justice of the supreme court, Mr. Collins is of New England birth, and traces his ancestry back to the early setlers of that section.  He was born August 7, 1838, at Lowell, Mass.  He attended the common schools and the high school, but never enjoyed the advantages of a college education.  This did not prevent him, however, from becoming a member of the supreme court and one of the leading lawyers of this state.  Judge Collins&apos; father was, for many years, an overseer at the cotton factories in Lowell and Chicopee, Mass.  The family moved from Lowell to Chicopee in 1840, when the subject of this sketch was only two years old.  They transferred themselves again from Chicopee to Palmer in 1851.  In 1853 the family came to Minnesota, locating on Eden Prairie, Hennepin County, and engaged in farming.  Judge Collins had qualified himself for the work of a teacher, and his first money was earned as a teacher of a country school near Cannon Falls in the winter of 1859 and 1860.  He taught four months for $60 and board.  In 1859 Judge Collins began the study of law with the firm of Smith, Smith &amp; Crosby, at Hastings.  He enlisted in 1862 in the Seventh Minnesota infantry.  These were troublous times on the borders, and in 1862
<lb>
and 1863 Mr. Collins served in the campaign against the Sioux Indians.  The Indian campaign being concluded, his regiment was sent South in the fall of 1863, Judge Collins going with it and serving with it to the end of the war in the Third Brigade, First Division, Sixteenth Army Corps.  He was mustered out as first lieutenant, August 12, 1865.  On his return from the war he resumed the practice of law at St. Cloud in May, 1866.  In 1868 he formed a partnership with Charles D. Kerr, which lasted until 1872, when Col. Kerr moved to St. Paul.  In 1879 he formed a partnership with Theodore Bruener, which was dissolved in 1881.  Judge Collins has always taken an active interest in politics and has held a number of important public positions.  He was a member of the legislature in 1881 and 1883, and judge of the district court in 1883 to 1887, when he was appointed justice of the supreme court by the governor to succeed Justice Berry.  He was elected in 1888 and has been on the supreme bench ever since.  While serving in the legislature in 1881, he was chairman of the normal school committee and a member of the judiciary committee.  In 1883 he was chairman of the finance committee, chairman of the committee on temperance legislation and a member of the judiciary committee.  At the extra session of 1881 the was one of the board of managers on the part of the house in the impeachment of Judge Cox.  He was elected county attorney of Stearns county for several years prior to 1881, and held the office of mayor of St. Cloud in 1876, &lsquo;77, &lsquo;78 and &lsquo;80.  When elected associate justice of the supreme court in 1888, he ran against George W. Batchelder, a Democrat, and his majority was 46,432, the largest received up to that time by any candidate on the state ticket, but in 1894 he increased it to 49,684 over John W. Wills, who was nominated by both the Populist and the Democrats.  This is the greatest majority ever received by any candidate on a state ticket.  Judge Collins is a member of the Masonic order, of the G. A. R., and the Loyal Legion.  He belongs to the Unitarian church, and was married September 4, 1878 to Ella M. Steward, at Berlin, Collins residence is at St. Cloud.  He has three children living Steward Garfield, Louis Loren and Loren Fletcher.</p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129028">028</controlpgno>
<printpgno>33</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>CUSHMAN KELLOGG DAVIS.</head>
<p>Cushman Kellogg Davis is the senior senator of Minnesota in the senate of the United States.  He is a descendant of Thomas Cushman and his wife, Mary Allerton.  She was the last survivor of those who came in the Mayflower.  Thomas was the son of Robert Cushman, the Puritan, who was the financial agent who fitted out the Mayflower and the Speedwell, and who was largely instrumental in procuring the Massachusetts grants from King James I.  His father, Horation Nelson Davis, and his mother, aged respectively eighty-five and eighty-two, live with him in St. Paul.  He, H. N. Davis, served for nearly four years as a captain in the War of the Rebellion.  He was a state senator from Rock County, Wisconsin, for several years, and was one of the pioneers of that state, having removed there from New York in 1838.  His wife, Clarissa Cushman (Davis) was a direct descendant of Robert Cushman.  Senator Davis was born at Henderson, New York, June 16, 1838.  He first went to school in a log school house at Waukesha, Wisconsin, to which place his parents removed when he was a child.  Subsequently he attended Carroll College, at the same place, completing the junior year, after which he entered the University of Michigan, where he graduated in 1857, in the classical course.  When he was in college he was a member of the Delta Phi fraternity.  In 1862 Mr. Davis enlisted in the army and was made first lieutenant in Company B, of the Twenty-eighth Wisconsin Infantry.  He served in the Vicksburg campaign, and in that in which Little Rock was taken.  While his military career was not particularly eventful he was always on duty and has an enviable record as a brave soldier.  In 1864, after having served nearly three years in the war and being very much broken in health on account of the hardships of the service, he came to Minnesota in search of health and was successful.  He settled in St. Paul and began the practice of law.  He had no influential friends to advance his interests, and owes his success to his natural abilities, to his professional equipment and to his fidelity to his clients.  He obtained his professional start in this state in defending, in St. Paul, in 1866, George L. Van Solen, on the
<lb>

<illus entity="i1912-006" map="no">
<caption>
<p>CUSHMAN KELLOGG DAVIS.</p></caption></illus>
charge of murder.  This was one of the most interesting cases of circumstantial evidence ever tried, but Mr. Davis was skillful, and his client was acquitted.  In 1878 occurred the famous impeachment trial of Judge Sherman Page, before the senate of Minnesota.  Mr. Davis was employed to defend Judge Page, and had associated with him Hon. John A. Lovely, of Albert Lea, and Hon. J. W. Losey, of La Crosse, Wisconsin.  Judge Page was acquitted.  Senator Davis has been actively engaged in his legal practice nearly all the time since his residence in the state, except when his public duties required his attention, and has been engaged on one side or the other of a great deal of the most important litigation in the history of Minnesota.  But in all his practice, he has never received a salary from any corporation, but has tried cases for and against corporations, the first side to apply for his services being the one on which he appeared.  He is senior member of the firm of Davis, Kellogg &amp; Severance.  Senator Davis has always been a Republican, and his first political preferment was as a member of the Minnesota House of Representatives in 1867.  In 1868 he was appointed United States district attorney, and held that office until 1873 when he resigned to accept the nomination for governor. 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129029">029</controlpgno>
<printpgno>34</printpgno></pageinfo>He made his campaign on an issue which he was largely instrumental in bringing to the front in this state&mdash;the right of the state to regulate railroad rates for passengers and freight by legislation.  He recommended such legislation in his message to the legislature and a statute to that effect was passed during his term, was signed by him and duly enforced.  Senator Davis declined a renomination for governor and upon the expiration of his term of office returned to the practice of his profession.  He took an active part, however, in every political campaign until 1887, when he was elected to the United States senate by the unanimous vote of his party.  He was re-elected in 1893, and is now serving his second term in the senate of the United States.  He was chairman of the pension committee during his entire first term in the senate, and was chiefly instrumental in preparing and securing the passage of the present pension law, which is so just to the government and the soldiers as to have practically terminated the agitation for pension legislation.  One of the most important services rendered to his constituents by Senator Davis was his championship of the improvement of the &ldquo;Soo&rdquo; canal.  About five years ago the necessity of larger locks and a deeper channel there became imperative, owing to the greatly increased traffic.  The usual practice, since the foundation of the government, of paying for government work, has been by annual appropriation, each year&apos;s work being covered in separate and generally insufficient appropriations, causing a delay, some times of a year and sometimes longer, for additional appropriations.  Senator Davis conceived the idea that such an important work as this should be done by contract, made in advance of the appropriation, the contractor relying upon the pledge of the government to be paid as the work progressed.  His idea was adopted; the work is now nearly completed, deepening the channel from 15 t 2 feet, and securing this result in a reasonable time.  It is unnecessary here to enlarge upon the importance of this work to the commercial and agricultural interests of the Northwest.  For four years Mr. Davis has been on the foreign relations committee, and last year made a speech criticising the policy of the Cleveland administration respecting Hawaii, which
<lb>
attracted general and favorable attention.  His speech on the questions at issue between Great Britain and the United States respecting Venezuela, laid down the lines upon which the recent treaty between Great Britain and Venezuela was formed.  He also discussed the general foreign policy of the administration in the North American Review a few months ago.  Some three years ago he advocated in the Forum the construction of locks around the falls of Niagara and the opening of a deep waterway from the head of Lake Superior to the Atlantic.  He has been a member, and is now chairman of the committee on territories since he became a senator, and took a conspicuous part in the admission of the two Dakotas.  He is a member of the senate committees on judiciary, census, foreign relations, Pacific railroads, territories and forest reservations.  He is recognized as one of the ablest men of that body, and no public utterance in the halls of congress in the last quarter of a century has attracted more attention or fired the public heart with a feeling of loyalty toward institutions more than his famous reply to Senator Peffer in defense of the president in the exercise of his power for the suppression of violence and the maintenance of the dignity and honor of the government at the time of the Chicago riots in 1894.  Senator Davis is a member of the Grand Army of the Republic, and, while not a member of any church, his affiliations have always been with the Congregational body.  He was married in 1880 to Anna Malcolm Agnew, of St. Paul.</p></div>
<div>
<head>CHARLES A. SMITH.</head>
<p>Charles A. Smith is a good sample of what a resolute, industrious, intelligent boy, unaided by fortune or friends, can accomplish in commercial life in the Northwest.  He is the son of a soldier in the regular army of Sweden, and was born December 11th, 1852, in the County of Ostergottland, Sweden.  After thirty-three years service in the army, his father, in the spring of 1867, left Sweden with Charles and an elder sister and came to America, arriving in Minneapolis on the 28th of June.  Two older brothers had already preceded them and were located here.  Charles&apos; education commenced in a small country 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129030">030</controlpgno>
<printpgno>35</printpgno></pageinfo>school in Sweden, where more importance was attached to committing the catechism and Bible history to memory than to writing and the knowledge of mathematics.  His first lessons in English were taken in a small log school house in Wright County.  Shortly after his arrival in this city from the old country arrangements were made for him to make his home with a farmer living in the southern part of what is now the city of Minneapolis, near the Milwaukee railroad shops.  He was to work for his board and clothing, and was employed chiefly in tending cattle.  While this employed on the farm he picked a large quantity of hazelnuts, which he sold for seven dollars, loaning the money to his brother at ten per cent.  This was the first money he had ever earned.  He had made good use of his time also in study, and in the fall of 1872 he entered the State University with the intention of taking the regular course.  He applied himself very closely to his studies and his health soon failed, so that he was obliged to leave school at the end of the first year.  In 1873 he obtained employment in the general hardware store of J. S. pillsbury &amp; Co., of this city, where he continued for five years.  He, the, in the fall of 1878, with the assistance of ex-Gov. Pillsbury, built a grain elevator at Herman, Minnesota, and under the name of C. A. Smith &amp; Co. he continued the grain and lumber business there until July, 1834, when arrangements were made to begin the manufacturing and wholesaling of lumber in Minneapolis.  He again took up his residence in this city, and the partnership with ex-Gov. Pillsbury was continued until 1893, at which time the C. A. Smith Lumber Company was incorporated, of which Mr. Smith is the president and general manager.  In addition to the saw mill and lumber manufacturing business of this city, this company has the controlling interest in a number of retail lumber yards and general stores in different parts of the state and in North and South Dakota.  Mr. Smith says the secret of his success has been adoption of Franklin&apos;s advice, which he learned with his first English lessons, viz., &ldquo;To take care of the pennies, and the dollars will take care of themselves.&rdquo;  He has tried to follow that advice ever since he sold his
<lb>

<illus entity="i1912-007" map="no">
<caption>
<p>CHARLES A. SMITH</p></caption></illus>
hazelnuts in the fall of 1867.  But Mr. Smith&apos;s activities have not been confined to the firm, of which he is a member.  He was one of the incorporators of the Swedish-American National Bank, the Security Savings and Loan Association, and other enterprises in this city and elsewhere.  Like most Swedish Americans, Mr. Smith is a Republican in politics, and devotes as much attention to it as his business will permit.  He has never held any officer or asked for any, but is prominent in the counsels of his party, having been a member of city, county, state and national conventions.  He is a member of the English Lutheran Salem Congregation, of Minneapolis; one of its organizers and one of its trustees.  He is also a member of the board of directors of the English Lutheran seminary, of Chicago, and is treasurer of the Evangelical Lutheran Synod of the Northwest.  He was married February 14th, 1878, to Johanna Anderson, a daughter of Olaf Anderson, who, after serving in the Swedish riksdag for a number of years, emigrated with his family to this country in 1857, and located in Carver county.  Mr. Smith has five children, two boys and three girls, Nanna A., Addie J., Myrtle E., Vernon A. and Carroll W.</p></div>
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129031">031</controlpgno>
<printpgno>36</printpgno></pageinfo>
<div>
<head>NATHAN CURTIS KINGSLEY.</head>
<illus entity="i1912-008" map="no">
<caption>
<p>NATHAN CURTIS KINGSLEY.</p></caption></illus>
<p>Nathan Curtis Kingsley is a resident of Austin, Minn., where he is engaged in the practice of law.  His father, Alonzo Kingsley, is a carpenter by trade, who enlisted in August, 1862, as a private soldier in the War of the Rebellion and served until the close of the war in the Fifteenth and Tenth Illinois Cavalry.  Alonzo Kingsley was a lineal descendant of one of three brother who emigrated from England in the early Colonial days and settled in Vermont, and his grand father, Wareham Kingsley, was a private soldier in the Revolutionary War.  Alonzo Kingsley&apos;s wife was Marilla Cecelia Pierson, a direct descendant of Stephen Pierson, who emigrated from England in 1656 and settled at New Haven, Conn.  The subject of this sketch was born at Sharon, Litchfield County, Conn., September 10, 1850.  His family removed to Illinois not long afterward, and Nathan received his early education in the country district schools.  His first money was earned as a farm laborer in La Salle County, Ill.  In March, 1869, he came to Minnesota and was employed as a farm laborer near Chatfield.  In 1870 he learned the miller&apos;s trade and worked at that business in Olmsted County until 1874, when he went to Rushford, Minn., continuing his trade
<lb>
there until February, 1877.  While working as a miller he began the study of law, and in November, 1876, was admitted to the bar, though he did not give up his trade until some time afterward.  In February, 1877, he formed a partnership for the practice of law with C. N. Enos, under the firm name of Enos &amp; Kingsley, and opened an office at Rushford, where he remained until December, 1878.  He then dissolved the partnership with Mr. Enos and removed to Chatfield, where he formed a partnership with R. A. Case.  He continued the practice of law at Chatfield until April, 1887, when he removed to Austin, where he now resides.  While a resident of Fillmore County, in 1880 he was elected country attorney, and in 1882 was re-elected.  Although solicited to accept a renomination in 1884 he declined to be a candidate.  After dissolving partnership with Mr. Case he formed a partnership with R. E. Shepherd, which association still continues.  From June, 1879, until his removal from Chatfield, he was president of the board of education of that town.  Mr. Kingsley has been identified with considerable very important litigation and has been instrumental in establishing some important principles of law.  Among other things the fact that a bank certificate of deposit in the ordinary form is, in substance and legal effect, a promissory note, and that no demand is necessary in order to set the statute of limitations running against it (Mitchell vs. Easton, 37 Minn. 335); also that the legislature may provide for constructive service of process sin actions to determine adverse claims to real estate where personal service is impracticable, and may clothe the district court with power to adjudicate the title and ownership of real property upon such constructive service (Shepard vs. Ware, 46 Minn., 174); also that Chapter 196, of the Law of 1887, relating to the sale of foreign-grown nursery stock in Minnesota, is in violation of the constitution of the United States, as being an attempt to regulate commerce among the states and depriving citizens of other states of the privileges and immunities of citizens of this state.  Mr. Kingsley is a Republican in politics, and has taken an active part in public affairs for the last fifteen years.  For four years he was a member-at-large of the State Republican Central Committee, and of the executive 
<pageinfo>
<controlpgno entity="i19129032">032</controlpgno>
<printpgno>37</printpgno></pageinfo>committee of that body.  He has been delegate to nearly all the state conventions for the last ten years, and to nearly all other conventions in which his county has been interested.  He has been a Free Mason for nearly twenty-four years, and is a member of a number of lodges of that order; also of the A. O. U. W., the K. of P., the Elks and the Masonic Veterans&apos; Association.  He has also held important offices in the order of Masonry, and in 1886 was Grand High Priest of the Grand Chapter of Minnesota.  He is at present General Grand Royal Arch Captain of the G. G. R. A. C of the United States.  He is a member of the Protestant Episcopal church.  Mr. Kingsley was married January 14, 1873, to Miss Clara Smith, a native of New York.  They have one child, Cora Marilla.</p></div>
<div>
<head>GEORGE BECKER EDGERTON.</head>
<p>George Becker Edgerton is the assistant attorney general of Minnesota, and resides in St. Paul.  His father, A. J. Edgerton, was the United States district judge of the district of South Dakota.  Judge Edgerton was appointed chief justice of the Territory of Dakota by President Arthur, in 1881, at which time he was a resident of Dodge County, Minnesota, having lived there since 1855.  When Hon. William Windom left the senate to take a position in the cabinet of President Garfield, Governor Pillsbury appointed Judge Edgerton to fill Mr. Windom&apos;s unexpired term.  Judge Edgerton&apos;s wife was Sarah C. Curtis.  Three of his ancestors served in the Revolutionary War, two as privates by the name of Palmer, and one by the name of White, who held the rank of captain, and was taken prisoner and conveyed to Canada.  The subject of this sketch was born at Mantorville, Dodge County, Minnesota, June 11, 1857.  He attended private and public schools in his native town, and attended Lawrence University, Appleton, Wisconsin, from 1872 till 1875.  In the fall of 1877 he entered his father&apos;s law office and studied with him two years.  He then attended lectures in 1879 and 1880 at the Columbia Law School, of New York City.  In June of 1880 he was admitted to the bar in the Fifth judicial district of Minnesota, and formed a partnership with his father.  In 1884 he was elected county attorney of Dodge County, serving one term.  He continued
<lb>

<illus entity="i1912-009" map="no">
<caption>
<p>GEORGE BECKER EDGERTON.</p></caption></illus>
the practice of his profession in Dodge County until April 1, 1890, when he was appointed assistant United States district attorney and removed to St. Paul.  In January, 1893, he resigned that position to accept the office of assistant attorney general, tendered him by Hon. H. W. Childs, which office he still holds.  In these several public positions Mr. Edgerton has been engaged in a number of very important cases.  His private practice has also been prosperous and successful.  He is at present a member of the law firm of Edgerton &amp; Wickwire, of St. Paul.  Mr. Edgerton has always been a Republican, and has taken an active part in different campaigns.  He was a delegate to the Republican national convention in 1888 from the First Congressional district of this state, and in that campaign took an active part on the stump.  He is a member of the Church Club, of the Diocese of Minnesota, an Episcopal organization; also a member of the Commercial Club, of St. Paul, and the Masonic Order.  He was married July 11, 1883, to Josie A. Godwin of Appleton, Wisconsin.  They have had five children, Margaret Godwin, Lillian Clark, Katharine Godwin, Josephine Godwin and George Godwin, 