| The Library of Congress | |
![]() |
![]() |
Rubric for "interview" answering the question "Was the New Deal North Carolina’s ‘Reconstruction’"?
|
Title: Name: |
|||
| Evaluation/Points |
|
|
|
| Research | Project reflects details and connections to American Life Histories interviews. More than 10 Life Histories have been researched. Depression research is evident. | Detailed use of American Life Histories interviews is present. (Fewer than 10, more than 4). Depression research is evident. | Lacks support from American Life Histories. (4-0) Reflects little research on the Depression. |
| Preparation | Project specifically reflects preparatory research on the New Deal in North Carolina, and details are referred to by "interviewer" or "subject." A connection to the success or failure of Reconstruction is obvious. | Some research is obvious, but details are lacking. Supporting references to Reconstruction are included. | Little to no research on the New Deal included. Lacks or has weak connection to Reconstruction. |
| Content | Project answers the question using realistic interview, dialect, and factual reference. Is focused and easy to read/understand. | Some factual basis, but lacks accuracy in interview technique or dialect. Easily read and understood. | Lacks specifics and is incorrect in 2 or more aspects or the requirements. Difficult to follow. |
| Presentation | Project uses 3 or more appropriate sensory enhancements to enrich the interview. | Project has 1-2 sensory enhancements which are appropriate to the topic. | Project lacks sensory enhancement or the 1-2 offered add little to the project. |
| Time on Task | Use of time and opportunities for research and completion of the project was efficient. Project completed on time. | Time occasionally wasted when opportunities in the media center or lab were provided. Project completed on time. | Lack of focus. Often off task when given research or lab opportunities. Project is late. |
| The Library of Congress | American Memory | Contact us |
| Last updated 09/26/2002 |